Top Headlines

Feeds

Hybe Appeals Court‑Ordered 25.5 Billion‑Won Payment to Former ADOR CEO

Updated (8 articles)
  • Min Hee-jin, a former CEO of a Hybe subsidiary named ADOR, arrives at a court in this file photo taken Sept. 11, 2025. (Yonhap)
    Min Hee-jin, a former CEO of a Hybe subsidiary named ADOR, arrives at a court in this file photo taken Sept. 11, 2025. (Yonhap)
    Image: Yonhap
    Min Hee-jin, a former CEO of a Hybe subsidiary named ADOR, arrives at a court in this file photo taken Sept. 11, 2025. (Yonhap) Source Full size

Hybe Files Appeal Against Court‑Ordered Put‑Option Payment Hybe lodged an appeal with Seoul Central District Court’s Civil Division 31 on Thursday, Feb 20, 2026, contesting a lower‑court order to pay 25.5 billion won to former ADOR CEO Min Hee‑jin. The original judgment, issued on Feb 12, also required Hybe to compensate two ex‑executives for similar claims. Hybe asked that the effect of the first‑trial ruling be suspended until the appellate court reaches a decision [1].

Dispute Originated From April 2024 Shareholder Conflict The legal battle traces back to an April 2024 disagreement over the shareholders’ agreement governing ADOR, a Hybe subsidiary. Hybe alleges Min Hee‑jin breached the contract by attempting to terminate NewJeans’ agency deal and by pushing for an ADOR IPO. Min was dismissed from her CEO role in August 2024 after Hybe claimed she acted against its interests [1].

Court Also Ordered Payments to Two Former Executives In the same Feb 12 ruling, the court ordered Hybe to pay 1.7 billion won and 1.4 billion won to two former ADOR executives for their own put‑option claims. These amounts are separate from the 25.5 billion‑won liability to Min. The payments reflect similar contractual disputes arising from the broader ADOR conflict [1].

Hybe’s Legal Strategy Focuses on Contract Violation Claims Hybe’s appeal argues that Min’s actions—targeting the girl group NewJeans and seeking an IPO—constituted a breach justifying termination of her contract. The company seeks to overturn the payment obligations by proving the shareholder agreement was lawfully ended. The appellate court’s decision will determine whether the lower‑court damages stand [1].

Sources

Related Tickers

Timeline

2015 – MBK Partners acquires 100 % of Homeplus from Tesco for 7.2 trillion won, taking full responsibility for the retailer’s strategy and financing, a deal that later becomes central to a criminal probe over Homeplus’s collapse [6][7][5].

April 2024 – A dispute erupts between Hybe and ADOR over Min Hee‑jin’s actions, which Hybe claims breach the shareholders’ agreement by targeting NewJeans and pushing an ADOR IPO, setting the stage for later litigation [1].

August 2024 – Hybe dismisses Min Hee‑jin as ADOR CEO after alleging she acted against Hybe’s interests, intensifying the put‑option conflict that will lead to a court‑ordered payment [1].

Feb 28 2025 – Korea Ratings downgrades Homeplus to A3‑minus, a rating cut that prosecutors later link to a large short‑term bond sale alleged to have been timed to the downgrade [6][4][7].

Mar 2025 – Homeplus files for court‑led rehabilitation four days after the downgrade, initiating a restructuring process that triggers investigations into MBK’s management decisions [6][4][7].

Dec 4 2025 – The Seoul Southern District Court freezes Bang Si‑hyuk’s Hybe shares worth 156.8 billion won as an asset‑preservation order amid a probe into alleged unfair stock trading and misleading investors in 2019 [8].

Jan 7 2026 – Seoul prosecutors request a warrant to question MBK Partners chairman Kim Byung‑ju and three senior executives about alleged fraud and Capital Markets Act violations tied to the Homeplus bond sale, moving the investigation toward possible arrests [7].

Jan 8 2026 – The Seoul Central District Court schedules a hearing for the following Tuesday to decide whether to issue arrest warrants for Kim Byung‑ju, three MBK executives, and a Homeplus co‑CEO, emphasizing the alleged large bond sale around the credit downgrade [6].

Jan 11 2026 – A hearing is set to determine arrest warrants for MBK leaders, while analysts note that the outcome could affect the upcoming March 2026 shareholders’ meeting on Korea Zinc’s control battle and a planned 10 trillion‑won joint investment with the U.S. government [5].

Jan 12 2026 – The court holds the arrest‑warrant hearing, focusing on whether the short‑term Homeplus bond issuance violated securities law, with a ruling expected later that day [4].

Jan 13 2026 – MBK chairman Kim Byung‑ju appears at the Seoul Central District Court without commenting, as the court deliberates the arrest‑warrant request for him and other executives [3].

Jan 14 2026 – The Seoul Central District Court denies the arrest warrants for Kim Byung‑ju and three MBK executives, citing insufficient evidence and no flight‑risk concerns, marking a setback for prosecutors [2].

Feb 20 2026 – Hybe files an appeal with Seoul Central District Court’s Civil Division 31, seeking a stay of the lower‑court order that obliges it to pay Min Hee‑jin 25.5 billion won in put‑option compensation and also 1.7 billion won and 1.4 billion won to two former ADOR executives, while arguing Min breached the shareholders’ contract [1].

Mar 2026 (planned) – Korea Zinc’s shareholders’ meeting is slated for March, where the outcome may be influenced by the MBK legal developments and the announced 10 trillion‑won joint investment with the U.S. government, potentially reshaping control of the critical‑metals firm [5].

All related articles (8 articles)