Author challenges Nammo director’s criticism of her book – Unni Eikeseth writes a debate piece responding to information director Korsvold’s objections to her recent work “Krigens laboratorium,” arguing the critique misrepresents her stance [1].
Nammo granted extensive access for the book project – The company let Eikeseth tour facilities, meet experts and use resources, which she cites as a rare example of transparency among Norwegian arms producers [1].
Eikeseth stresses genuine interest in weapons‑technology ethics – She says her research aims to understand science’s role in Norway’s defence sector, noting she sees no moral divide between weapon makers and the citizens who endorse production [1].
She highlights the ethical paradox of lethal research – The author points out that while scientific ethics demand benefits for humanity, the same knowledge is applied to create deadly armaments [1].
Korsvold previously defended controversial arms sales – The director has argued for Nammo’s right to sell precision weapons to Israel via its U.S. subsidiary and acknowledges that those weapons may have been used against civilians in Gaza, actions that undermine international law [4][5].
Call for a research‑based debate on defence‑industry ties – Eikeseth urges Norwegian universities and research institutes to discuss the appropriateness of close relationships with the weapons industry amid broader climate and security challenges [1].