Funding hinges on proven technology and loan length – Aubarbier explains that nuclear projects with a solid track record and government backing attract lower interest rates; shorter loan periods (e.g., 60 months vs. 200 months) reduce total interest and lower the megawatt‑hour cost, making financing easier to secure [1].
Overall schedule from contract to grid connection is 100‑140 months – For a proven technology, the contract‑to‑construction start can be about 36 months, with optimal construction lasting roughly 60 months; the full timeline to grid connection therefore spans just over eight to just under twelve years [1].
France’s EPR2 construction target is 70‑75 months – The ambitious target aims to support the goal of tripling nuclear capacity by 2050; meeting this schedule is seen as essential for securing low‑interest financing and competitive MWh pricing [1].
Funding and off‑taker certainty are universal success factors – Assystem is engaged in 13‑14 new nuclear programmes worldwide; regardless of a country’s wealth, the ability to secure an off‑taker and affordable financing determines project viability [1].
Regulatory standards are converging, but licensing paths differ – Most new entrants adopt European or U.S. safety standards, reducing technical gaps; however, Western nations often face slower regulatory adaptation, while many newcomer countries can adjust licensing processes more quickly [1].
Assystem’s fusion work includes ITER delivery and future research – After 15 years on ITER, Assystem delivered the tokamak building on schedule in 2020 and continues construction‑management work; it also supports fusion start‑ups, though commercial electricity from fusion is expected nearer the end of the century [1].