Trump Revives Greenland Annexation Idea Trump repeatedly floated the notion that Greenland could become a U.S. territory as part of a broader national‑security strategy, and the White House publicly framed the island’s Arctic position as a strategic pivot for America [1]. Betting platforms such as Polymarket, Kalshi and BetOnline priced the prospect as a long‑shot, reflecting market skepticism about any rapid acquisition [1]. Despite the rhetoric, no formal diplomatic or legislative steps have been announced, leaving the proposal largely speculative [1].

International Allies View Proposal as Sovereignty Threat European partners expressed alarm, characterizing the annexation talk as a breach of Greenland’s sovereignty and a potential fracture in NATO cohesion [1]. In response, several NATO members are reportedly weighing increased military deployments to the island to reassure allies [1]. Denmark and Greenland’s own leadership reiterated that Greenland is not for sale and emphasized the right to self‑determination, rejecting any U.S. takeover [1].

Domestic Opinion Shows Minimal Support for Military Action YouGov poll indicated that only a small minority of Americans favor using force to acquire Greenland, with most preferring diplomatic or non‑military avenues [1]. Within Congress, a mix of Republicans and centrists criticized the idea as a dangerous distraction that could trigger impeachment pressure if pursued [1]. The limited public backing undermines any realistic path toward a forced annexation [1].

No Concrete Steps Taken, Diplomatic Tension Persists To date, Trump has not moved beyond verbal threats; no occupation, treaty negotiation, or legislative proposal has materialized [1]. The ongoing debate continues to cast a shadow over U.S.–European relations and fuels cautious discussion within NATO circles [1]. The situation remains a diplomatic strain without actionable progress [1].