Top Headlines

Feeds

Seoul Mayor Oh Se‑hoon's Proxy Poll Trial Scheduled for March 4 Amid Election Countdown

Updated (6 articles)
  • An undated file photo of Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon (Yonhap)
    Image: Yonhap
    An undated file photo of Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon (Yonhap) Source Full size

Trial Date Fixed and Bi‑weekly Schedule Established The Seoul Central District Court set the first formal hearing for March 4, with subsequent sessions every two weeks, creating a predictable timetable for the case [1]. A preparatory session held earlier this week confirmed the schedule and listed the participants, including Mayor Oh, supporter Kim Han‑jung, and former Deputy Mayor Kang Cheol‑won [1]. The court’s decision aims to manage the procedural flow while the political calendar advances toward local elections [1].

Alleged 33 Million‑Won Proxy Payment to Opinion‑Poll Broker Prosecutors allege Oh arranged for Kim Han‑jung to transfer 33 million won (approximately US$22,400) to Myung Tae‑kyun for ten opinion polls conducted between January and February 2021 [1]. The payment is described as a proxy intended to conceal Oh’s direct involvement in commissioning the surveys [1]. Special counsel investigators used the transaction as primary evidence when indicting Oh on charges of using a proxy to fund the polls [1].

Key Witnesses Include Whistleblower and Self‑Proclaimed Broker Early trial sessions will question Kang Hye‑kyung, the whistleblower who first raised suspicion about the proxy payment, and Myung Tae‑kyun, who identifies himself as a power broker in the poll market [1]. Their testimonies are expected to clarify the purpose of the payment and the nature of the relationship between the political figures and the poll operator [1]. Both witnesses are slated to appear in the first two formal hearings, providing critical insight into the alleged scheme [1].

Political Timing Tied to June Local Elections Mayor Oh requested the court schedule the trial to minimize political fallout ahead of the June local elections, arguing that a predictable calendar would reduce disruption to his campaign [1]. The court’s bi‑weekly format aligns with Oh’s strategy to contain the case’s visibility during the crucial election period [1]. Observers note that the timing could influence voter perception as the trial proceeds concurrently with campaign activities [1].

Sources

Timeline

Feb–Mar 2021 – Supporter Kim Han‑jung pays 33 million won in five installments to an employee of Future Korea Research Institute, a polling firm run by Myung Tae‑kyun, to fund ten opinion polls conducted Jan–Feb 2021 ahead of Oh Se‑hoon’s April mayoral campaign; Myung later says Oh asks for polls that would show him ahead of rival Na Kyung‑won[5][6].

Dec 1, 2025 – A special‑counsel team led by Min Joong‑ki indicts Seoul Mayor Oh Se‑hoon, supporter Kim Han‑jung and former Deputy Mayor Kang Cheol‑won for violating the Political Funds Act by arranging the 33 million‑won proxy payment for the 2021 opinion polls; Oh denies commissioning or receiving the surveys and calls them “fabricated” and “fake”[3][5].

Dec 9, 2025 – The Seoul Central District Court schedules a preparatory hearing for the case on Dec 23, marking the start of judicial proceedings on the alleged illegal political funds[2].

Dec 2025 – The indictment forms part of a broader corruption probe linked to former first lady Kim Keon‑hee, while the Democratic Party and People Power Party negotiate the 2026 national budget, underscoring a tense political climate[4].

Jan 28, 2026 – The court announces that the first formal trial will begin on Mar 4, 2026, with biweekly sessions; witnesses Kang Hye‑kyung and Myung Tae‑kyun are slated to testify, and Oh requests a schedule that limits political fallout ahead of the June local elections[1][1].

Mar 4, 2026 – The first formal trial of Oh Se‑hoon commences, establishing a two‑week interval for subsequent hearings as the case proceeds amid his campaign for the June 2026 local elections[1].

June 2026 – Seoul holds its local elections, where Oh Se‑hoon seeks re‑election while the proxy‑payment trial continues to shape public perception[1].

All related articles (6 articles)