Top Headlines

Feeds

FBI Terminates Approximately Ten Agents Linked to Trump Classified Documents Probe

Updated (5 articles)

FBI Announces Dismissal of Ten Agents The FBI confirmed on Feb. 27, 2026 that roughly ten agents who worked on the classified‑documents investigation involving former President Donald Trump were terminated [1]. The agency’s statement listed the personnel action without naming the individuals [1]. All dismissed staff had participated in the probe led by Special Counsel Jack Smith, which examines Trump’s retention of classified material at Mar‑a‑Lago after his 2021 departure from office [1]. The bureau asserted the terminations were unrelated to any ongoing criminal investigation [1].

Subpoenas Prompted Timing of Firings The firings followed FBI Director Kash Patel’s disclosure that his private‑citizen phone records and those of White House chief of staff Susie Wiles had been subpoenaed during the documents case [1]. Patel told Reuters the subpoenas were routine investigative steps and did not indicate misconduct by the agents [1]. He offered no evidence that any of the terminated employees engaged in wrongdoing related to the probe [1]. Observers noted the close timing, though the FBI denied any retaliatory motive [1].

Agency and Union Reactions to Dismissals The FBI Agents Association condemned the terminations, saying they “weaken the Bureau by stripping away critical expertise and destabilizing the workforce” [1]. Union leaders warned the loss of experienced personnel could hinder recruitment and retention goals [1]. Department of Justice officials referenced similar personnel actions since Trump’s return to the White House, citing prior cases involving former FBI director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James [1]. Critics argued the pattern reflects broader political pressure on law‑enforcement agencies [1].

Broader Context of Trump‑Related Investigations Special Counsel Jack Smith continues to oversee two federal inquiries: the 2020 election interference case and the classified‑documents investigation at Mar‑a‑Lago [1]. Prosecutors remain active in the documents probe, seeking additional evidence and potential charges against Trump and his aides [1]. The recent personnel changes add a new layer to the already contentious environment surrounding the investigations [1]. Analysts will watch whether the dismissals affect the probe’s timeline or outcomes [1].

Sources

Timeline

June 4, 2020 – Twelve FBI agents kneel during a Washington, D.C., protest after George Floyd’s death to de‑escalate a volatile crowd, a tactic that disperses the mob without violence and later becomes central to disputes over their termination [2][5].

2020 (post‑June) – An internal FBI review finds the kneeling was apolitical, notes no Hatch Act violation, and recommends no disciplinary action, a conclusion the agents later cite in their lawsuits [5].

2021 – After President Donald Trump leaves office, Special Counsel Jack Smith launches two federal inquiries—one on the 2020 election and another on Trump’s retention of classified documents at Mar‑a‑Lago—setting the stage for later DOJ and FBI actions [1].

June‑July 2022 – FBI field agents email senior officials expressing doubts about probable cause for a Mar‑a‑Lago search and suggest using Trump’s attorney Evan Corcoran instead of a warrant; these communications later surface in a Senate Judiciary Committee release [4].

August 2022 – The Justice Department secures a broad search warrant despite internal FBI concerns, executes the Mar‑a‑Lago raid, and recovers more than 300 classified documents, fueling ongoing legal battles over the raid’s legality [4].

July 2024 – Judge Aileen Cannon dismisses the classified‑documents charges against Trump, ruling Special Counsel Jack Smith was not properly appointed, intensifying partisan disputes over the investigation [4].

December 8, 2025 – Twelve former FBI agents file a civil action against the FBI and Director Kash Patel, alleging wrongful termination for kneeling during the 2020 protest; the complaint asserts the firing stemmed from a White House directive and cites Patel’s termination letters that claim “unprofessional conduct” and “lack of impartiality” [3][5].

December 9, 2025 – The same agents file a separate lawsuit in the District of Columbia seeking reinstatement, back pay, and expungement of termination records, arguing the kneeling was a tactical de‑escalation, not a political act, and that the dismissals constitute partisan retaliation [2].

December 16, 2025 – FBI Director Kash Patel posts on X, “DOJ didn’t give a damn,” accusing the Justice Department of ignoring FBI emails that warned the Mar‑a‑Lago raid lacked probable cause; Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley releases the 2022 FBI emails, calling the raid a miscarriage of justice [4].

February 27, 2026 – The FBI confirms the termination of roughly ten agents who worked on the classified‑documents probe, noting Director Patel offers no evidence of misconduct and that the dismissals follow subpoenas of Patel’s and White House chief of staff Susie Wiles’ phone records; the FBI Agents Association condemns the moves as weakening the bureau’s expertise and recruitment goals [1].

All related articles (5 articles)

External resources (1 links)