CFTC Chair Endorses Kalshi and Polymarket Amid Federal Legal Battle Over Prediction Markets
Updated (4 articles)
Federal Backing and Legal Challenge CFTC chair Michael Selig announced federal support for Kalshi and Polymarket, arguing that states cannot override the agency’s exclusive jurisdiction over event contracts [2]. Nevada, Massachusetts and other states have sued the platforms as unlicensed sportsbooks, and a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order against Kalshi in Nevada, prompting a “friend of the court” brief in the 9th Circuit [2]. The CFTC’s stance could reshape the regulatory framework for sports wagering and broader prediction markets [2].
Trading Volume and Market Growth Kalshi reports more than $1 billion in contracts traded around the Super Bowl, with roughly 90 % tied to sports, while Polymarket’s activity is about half sports‑related [2]. Both platforms have expanded beyond sports into geopolitics, pop culture, and crypto‑based “shares” that trade like stocks, exemplified by a February 4 question on Epstein disclosures where “Yes” shares priced at $0.19 and “No” at $0.82 [1]. This diversification fuels rapid user growth and social‑media virality across topics such as Israel‑Gaza air strikes and Elon Musk tweet counts [1].
Political Connections and Conflict Concerns Donald Trump Jr. joined Kalshi as a strategic advisor in January 2025 and his firm 1789 Capital invested in Polymarket’s advisory board, prompting scrutiny of potential conflicts of interest given the administration’s regulatory support [1][2]. Both outlets note that no legal wrongdoing has been alleged, but the political ties raise questions about impartiality in the CFTC’s endorsement [2]. Critics argue the involvement could influence policy decisions affecting the burgeoning prediction‑market industry [2].
Regulatory Landscape and International Bans Kalshi operates under CFTC regulation but faces state‑level challenges and lawsuits, while Polymarket is blocked in 33 countries, including the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom and Singapore [1]. The divergent regulatory status underscores a fragmented global approach, with U.S. federal oversight contrasting sharply with outright bans elsewhere [1]. Ongoing legal battles may determine whether federal jurisdiction can supersede state restrictions and international prohibitions [2].
Critics Warn of Harm and Misinformation Opponents cite gambling‑related harms, the spread of false news, and insider‑trading risks associated with prediction markets [1]. Polymarket’s disputed claim about Jeff Bezos and Kalshi’s false posting about U.S.–Denmark talks attracted official clarifications, highlighting concerns over misinformation and click‑bait marketing tactics [1]. Advocacy groups argue that while proponents tout crowd‑sourced truth, the platforms may encourage violence and undermine factual discourse [1].
Sources
-
1.
The Hindu: Prediction Markets Surge Amid Legal, Ethical Scrutiny – Details rapid expansion into geopolitics and pop culture, crypto‑based share trading, Trump Jr. advisory role, regulatory split, and marketing controversies.
-
2.
Newsweek: Trump Administration Backs Prediction Markets in Sports Betting Fight – Focuses on CFTC chair Michael Selig’s federal support, state lawsuits, $1 billion trading volume, and political conflict‑of‑interest concerns.
Timeline
2020 – Kalshi becomes federally regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, giving it a formal regulatory framework unlike many prediction‑market platforms [2].
2024 – Prediction‑market operators attract hundreds of millions of dollars in wagers during the U.S. presidential election, illustrating the sector’s rapid growth and high‑stakes nature [1].
Jan 2025 – Donald Trump Jr. announces he joins Kalshi as a strategic adviser and his firm 1789 Capital invests in Polymarket’s advisory board, sparking scrutiny over political ties to the industry [4].
Dec 2025 – An anonymous user creates a Polymarket account (identified only by a blockchain string) and later places large bets on Venezuelan political outcomes [1].
Jan 2, 2026 (afternoon) – Polymarket’s market price for Nicolás Maduro’s exit sits at about 6.5%, reflecting modest speculation of a regime change [1].
Jan 2, 2026 (just before midnight) – The same market’s odds climb to roughly 11% as traders react to emerging rumors of a possible capture [1].
Jan 3, 2026 (early hours) – President Donald Trump posts that Maduro is in U.S. custody, triggering a sharp market surge and massive position shifts on Polymarket [1].
Jan 5, 2026 – The anonymous Polymarket account converts a $32,537 stake into more than $436,000 after the Maduro capture news, prompting insider‑trading concerns [1].
Jan 5, 2026 – Dennis Kelleher of Better Markets says the trade “has all the hallmarks of a trade based on inside information,” underscoring regulatory alarm [1].
Jan 5, 2026 – Congressman Ritchie Torres introduces legislation to bar government employees from trading on prediction markets when they possess material nonpublic information [1].
Jan 11, 2026 – An anonymous trader cashes out over $400,000 from a Maduro‑exit bet on Polymarket, reinforcing suspicions of pre‑announcement knowledge [3].
Jan 11, 2026 – Lawmakers, led by Rep. Torres, push a crackdown on insider trading in prediction markets, citing the Maduro payout as a catalyst [3].
Jan 11, 2026 – The CFTC operates with a reduced staff and only one of five commissioner seats filled, raising doubts about its capacity to police the booming market [3].
Feb 17, 2026 – CFTC Chair Michael Selig publicly backs Kalshi and Polymarket, stating that states “cannot undermine the agency’s exclusive jurisdiction” over event contracts [2].
Feb 17, 2026 – Selig’s stance signals a potential shift of sports‑betting regulation to the federal level, which could allow prediction markets to operate nationwide even where gambling is banned [2].
Feb 17, 2026 – Nevada, Massachusetts and other states sue the platforms; a federal judge issues a temporary restraining order against Kalshi in Nevada, prompting a 9th Circuit appeal [2].
Feb 17, 2026 – Donald Trump Jr.’s investment in Polymarket and advisory role at Kalshi raise conflict‑of‑interest concerns amid the administration’s support [2].
Feb 17, 2026 – Industry advocate John Berlau praises the CFTC move as legitimizing risk‑hedging, while Utah Governor Spencer Cox dismisses prediction markets as “gambling” [2].
Feb 18, 2026 – Polymarket trades crypto‑based “shares” on USDC via the Polygon network; a February 4 question on Epstein disclosures shows “Yes” shares at $0.19 and “No” at $0.82, illustrating volatile pricing [4].
Feb 18, 2026 – Kalshi reports over $1 billion in contracts traded, about 90% tied to sports, while roughly half of Polymarket’s activity is sports‑related [2].
Feb 18, 2026 – Regulatory status diverges: Kalshi operates under CFTC oversight, whereas Polymarket is blocked in 33 countries, including the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom and Singapore [4].
2026 (ongoing) – The 9th Circuit appeal on Nevada’s restraining order will determine whether federal preemption can override state gambling laws, shaping the future legal landscape for prediction markets [2].
All related articles (4 articles)
-
The Hindu: Prediction Markets Surge Amid Legal, Ethical Scrutiny
-
Newsweek: Trump Administration Backs Prediction Markets in Sports Betting Fight
-
AP: Payout on Maduro bet spotlights prediction markets
-
BBC: Anonymous Polymarket account turned $32,537 into $436,000 after surge in bets on Maduro capture