Top Headlines

Feeds

DOJ and Ohio Attorney General File Antitrust Suit Against OhioHealth

Updated (2 articles)

Federal and State Officials Initiate Lawsuit on Feb 20, 2026 The U.S. Department of Justice and Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio on Feb 20, 2026, accusing OhioHealth of anticompetitive conduct that harms patients and employers [1]. The filing alleges the health system leverages its size to limit competition across central Ohio [1]. OhioHealth said it has not been served with the complaint and declined to comment while the case proceeds [1].

Complaint Accuses OhioHealth of Market Dominance and Price Inflation The suit claims OhioHealth controls roughly 40% of the regional hospital market and negotiates prices about 50% higher than competing providers [1]. It alleges the system forces insurers to keep OhioHealth in every commercial network, blocking lower‑priced alternatives [1]. Contractual clauses dating back to 2003 are said to prevent insurers from offering cheaper plans, inflating premiums and out‑of‑pocket costs for patients [1].

OhioHealth Network Spans 17 Hospitals Competing With Major Systems OhioHealth operates 16 hospitals in central Ohio and one additional facility, totaling 17 hospitals [1]. Its competitors include Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and the Mount Carmel Health System, owned by Trinity Health [1]. The antitrust allegations target how this network allegedly suppresses competition from these academic and Catholic health systems [1].

Potential Impact on Patients and Employers Highlighted The complaint warns that the restrictive contracts have deprived patients of cheaper insurance options since at least 2003 [1]. By inflating provider prices, the alleged practices raise health‑care premiums for employers and increase out‑of‑pocket expenses for individuals [1]. The lawsuit seeks to dismantle these practices to restore market competition and lower costs [1].

Sources

Timeline

2003 – OhioHealth inserts contractual clauses that force insurers to keep it in all commercial networks, blocking lower‑priced alternatives and inflating premiums for patients and employers, a practice later cited in antitrust complaints [1].

2024 – LeadingAge Ohio, the Ohio Health Care Association, and the Academy of Senior Health Sciences sue the state over a Medicaid formula error that misallocates 60 % of the price‑change rather than 60 % of the direct‑care‑cost rate change, underpaying nursing homes by an estimated $527 million for the 2024‑25 budget and affecting 926 facilities serving about 66 000 residents [2].

Sept 2025 – The Ohio Supreme Court issues a unanimous decision ordering the state to pay nursing homes up to $1 billion, finding the Department of Medicaid’s calculation method incorrect and confirming a $527 million shortfall for 2024‑25 [2].

Nov 2025 – The Department of Medicaid’s motion to revisit the Supreme Court ruling is denied, leaving the erroneous rates unchanged and postponing any payment to facilities [2].

Feb 1, 2026 – Four months after the court order, no Medicaid payments have been issued; the Ohio Department of Medicaid says it is working through logistics and will update the timeline, while OHCA CEO Scott Wiley warns the unpaid funds could be treated as taxable income, adding financial pressure on nursing homes [2].

Feb 20, 2026 – The U.S. Department of Justice and Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost file an antitrust lawsuit in the Southern District of Ohio accusing OhioHealth of leveraging its roughly 40 % market share to force insurers to include it in every commercial plan, inflating prices by about 50 % versus competitors; Yost says the provider “leverages its market strength to block lower‑priced options,” and CBS News notes the system “commands roughly 40 % of the market and charges 50 % more” [1].

All related articles (2 articles)

External resources (5 links)