Judge Orders DOJ to Release Internal Emails Over Alleged Improper Motivation in Garcia Prosecution
Updated (2 articles)
Federal Judge Crenshaw scrutinizes DOJ involvement U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw issued a December 3, 2025 ruling that unsealed internal Justice Department communications suggesting senior officials pushed the human‑smuggling case against Salvadoran national Abrego Garcia[1][2]. The opinion challenges the government’s claim that the prosecution decision was purely local, noting coordination between Washington and Nashville prosecutors[2]. Crenshaw ordered the defense to obtain the documents, emphasizing due‑process concerns over alleged vindictive motives[1][2].
Emails reveal priority messaging from Blanche’s office Emails from Associate Deputy Attorney General Aakash Singh dated April 30 and May 15, 2025 show he directed that Garcia’s case be treated as a “top priority,” echoing directives from Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s office[1][2]. Communications with Middle District of Tennessee’s lead prosecutor Robert McGuire aimed to accelerate charges while Garcia was detained in El Salvador[2]. Both outlets note the messages contradict earlier statements that the indictment stemmed solely from local prosecutorial discretion[1][2].
Garcia pleads not guilty, claims retaliatory prosecution Garcia entered a not‑guilty plea to federal human‑smuggling charges in Tennessee, arguing the case is a politically motivated retaliation tied to embarrassment over his mistaken deportation[1]. He contends the Trump administration used the prosecution to punish him for fighting his removal to El Salvador[1]. The defense’s motion to dismiss centers on the alleged improper motivation highlighted in the judge’s ruling[2].
Court orders disclosure and upcoming hearing Crenshaw ordered the DOJ to produce the internal emails and related documents despite privilege claims, stating the government’s interest in secrecy is outweighed by the defendant’s right to a non‑vindictive prosecution[1][2]. A hearing on the motion to dismiss is scheduled for January 28, 2026, and a Maryland judge has barred further immigration detention of Garcia while the case proceeds[1]. The trial, previously set for the following month, remains postponed with no new date announced[2].
Sources
-
1.
Newsweek: Judge questions DOJ top‑priority prosecution of Abrego Garcia after deportation error – Details the unsealed court order, emails from Todd Blanche’s office, and the judge’s demand for DOJ document disclosure, emphasizing potential improper motivation behind the prosecution.
-
2.
CNN: Judge says top DOJ officials may have pressed to prosecute Abrego Garcia, unsealed ruling shows – Highlights the role of Aakash Singh and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in prioritizing the case, the court’s order to produce privileged documents, and the upcoming January hearing.
Timeline
2019 – A federal court rules that Abrego Garcia cannot be removed to El Salvador because he faces a credible risk of gang‑related violence, establishing a protective precedent for his immigration status. [1]
June 2025 – After being mistakenly deported, Garcia is brought back to the United States and placed on pre‑trial release in Maryland, setting the stage for federal human‑smuggling charges to proceed. [1]
April 30, 2025 – Associate Deputy Attorney General Aakash Singh emails senior DOJ officials, stating that the case “should be charged sooner rather than later,” indicating a top‑priority push to prosecute Garcia following the deportation error. [2]
May 15, 2025 – Singh follows up with another message reinforcing the urgency, writing that “the prosecution is a priority” and urging rapid indictment, further evidencing high‑level involvement. [2]
Dec 3, 2025 – U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw issues an unsealed ruling that “the decision to prosecute was local and free from outside influences” is contradicted by DOJ emails, orders the production of privileged documents, and notes that “the prosecution may have been retaliatory.” [1][2]
Dec 2025 (early month) – A Maryland judge bars immigration authorities from detaining Garcia again while his case is pending, reinforcing judicial oversight of the alleged vindictive prosecution. [2]
Jan 28, 2026 – A hearing on the trafficking prosecution is scheduled in Tennessee, where the court will consider Garcia’s motion to dismiss and assess whether the DOJ’s “top‑priority” push violated his due‑process rights. [2]
Late Jan 2026 – A major hearing on the motion to dismiss is set, continuing the scrutiny of DOJ involvement; the previously scheduled trial remains postponed with no new date announced. [1]