Steve Bannon’s April 2018 iMessage Log Shows Legal Talk, Meeting Plans, and Personal Jabs

Key Facts

• Bannon discusses upcoming legal representation for Trump – In messages dated 2018/04/10, Bannon notes “He is going to be the next lead lawyer,” indicating planning for Trump’s legal team amid ongoing investigations [1].
• Talk of subpoenaing a journalist and invoking First Amendment privilege – Bannon writes that had they subpoenaed “Pecker” they would have claimed First Amendment privilege, suggesting a strategy to block evidence searches [1].
• References to Michael Cohen’s potential departure – Bannon states “If Cohen went we r fucked,” implying concern that Cohen’s exit could jeopardize Trump’s position [1].
• Plans for meetings with John Kerry and others – Multiple messages propose meeting Kerry in Washington or NYC and mention travel to Cambridge, DC, and NYC for discussions on unspecified matters [1].
• Comments on Trump’s executive‑privilege waiver – Bannon describes Trump “reconfirming his lawyers executive privilege waiver seemed nuts,” indicating criticism of Trump’s handling of privilege claims [1].
• Allusions to broader political topics and personal remarks – The chat includes remarks such as “Larry Summers definitely has Asperger syndrome,” “Alex Jones and Mike Savage agree,” and “Stable Genius bringing himself down,” reflecting Bannon’s informal commentary on political figures and media personalities [1].

Who Said What

• Steve Bannon: “He is going to be the next lead lawyer.” – indicating an upcoming appointment for Trump’s legal team.
• Steve Bannon: “If Cohen went we r fucked.” – expressing concern over Michael Cohen’s potential departure.
• Steve Bannon: “Trump reconfirming his lawyers executive privilege waiver seemed nuts.” – criticizing Trump’s executive‑privilege stance.
• Steve Bannon: “Larry Summers definitely has Asperger syndrome.” – personal jab at former Treasury secretary.
• Steve Bannon: “Stable Genius bringing himself down.” – referencing Trump’s self‑described nickname.

Some Context

• Executive privilege: A claim by the U.S. president to withhold information from other government branches, often invoked to protect confidential communications.
• First Amendment privilege: A legal argument that journalists are protected from compelled disclosure of sources or unpublished material, based on free‑speech rights.
• Michael Cohen: Former personal attorney to Donald Trump, central to investigations into Trump’s business practices.
• John Kerry: Former U.S. Secretary of State, mentioned as a potential meeting target in the messages.
• Larry Summers: Economist and former Treasury secretary, referenced disparagingly by Bannon.

Steve Bannon Coordinates International Meetings Amid Tariff Threats, June 2018

Key Facts

• Bannon arranges meetings in Paris, Italy, and DC in mid‑June 2018 – iMessage logs show Bannon scheduling a Paris dinner, offering a plane to Italy, confirming his presence in Washington, D.C., and discussing travel flexibility for the next two weeks [1].
• Jagland‑Lavrov meeting and Putin’s Paris visit discussed – A message notes “Jagland meeting with Lavrov … Putin coming straight to Paris on fri. Staying overnight with me,” indicating coordination with high‑level diplomatic figures [1].
• Washington Post opinion piece cited on Bannon’s post‑firing influence – Bannon shares a link to a June 17, 2018 Washington Post article titled “He was fired 10 months ago, but Stephen K Bannon has won,” which frames his ideology as shaping the Trump administration [2].
• Bannon warns of $400 billion China tariffs and possible war with Xi – He writes “Dude: just him to the trigger on $400 billion in tariffs on China” and later “It’s war … Xi could fall,” linking tariff policy to geopolitical risk [1].
• Lawfare blog link provided on presidential indictment history – A message includes a URL to a Lawfare article, “Indicting a President Is Not Foreclosed: The Complex History,” suggesting Bannon’s interest in legal strategies against political opponents [3].
• Subpoenas cited as affecting meeting logistics – Bannon notes “meetings now on these subpoenas,” implying legal constraints on his travel and coordination plans [1].

Who Said What

• Steve Bannon: “Your review today was powerful. Good work.” – praising a colleague’s analysis.
• Steve Bannon: “No problem‑a lot exploded yesterday.” – acknowledging a schedule change.
• Steve Bannon: “It’s war … Xi could fall.” – expressing concern over China‑related tensions.
• Washington Post opinion: “He was fired 10 months ago, but Stephen K Bannon has won.” – summarizing Bannon’s enduring ideological impact.

Some Context

• Thorbjørn Jagland – Former Norwegian prime minister and current President of the Storting; his meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov signals diplomatic outreach.
• Sergey Lavrov – Russia’s long‑standing foreign minister; involvement indicates high‑level Russian engagement.
• Bannonism – Term used to describe Stephen K Bannon’s brand of nationalist, anti‑immigrant politics that influenced the Trump administration’s policies.
• Lawfare – A legal‑policy blog focusing on national security and constitutional issues; the cited article examines historical attempts to indict U.S. presidents.
• Subpoenas – Legal orders compelling testimony or document production; Bannon’s reference suggests ongoing investigations affecting his movements.

Bannon’s Early‑February 2019 iMessage Chat Links Trump, Foreign Funding and Legal Tactics

Key Facts

• Steve Bannon led a Feb 2‑5, 2019 iMessage thread on political strategy – The transcript records Bannon and contacts exchanging messages from 02/02 to 02/05 2019, referencing a “Haberman piece,” urging action against Jared Kushner, and noting “He is trump” and a heads‑up from Whittaker [1].
• Participants framed a humanitarian crisis as a constitutional issue – They argued that a “textualist argument kills any defense” of a national‑emergency claim, asserting it is not grounded in the Constitution and describing the crisis as “killing” policy arguments [1].
• Saudi, Qatari and Turkish financing was flagged as a concern – Bannon claimed “KSA finances half of these klowns,” listed Qatar and Turkey, and mentioned a prospective UN investigation tribunal for “mbs‑oy” (likely Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman) [1].
• Bannon invoked Abraham Lincoln’s use of unlimited presidential power – He likened current tactics to Lincoln’s “slammed the table” moment, suggesting the president has “unlimited power to fight the enemy” as a historical precedent [1].
• The chat shared external links to an Axios leak and a NYTimes science story – A URL to an Axios article about leaked Trump executive schedules and a NYTimes piece on axolotl gene research were posted, showing the participants’ media monitoring [2][3].
• A Qatar delegation’s 2016 Trump Tower meeting and a WaPo subpoena were cited – Messages referenced a Facebook note that a Qatari minister met Michael Flynn and Bannon at Trump Tower in Dec 2016, and a Washington Post article about a sweeping subpoena to the Trump inaugural committee [3].

Who Said What

• Steve Bannon: “You are his only hope.” – urging a contact to act in the conversation.
• Steve Bannon: “I’m pushing Jared needs squashed.” – expressing intent to target Jared Kushner.
• Steve Bannon: “He is trump.” – affirming Trump’s central role.
• Steve Bannon: “KSA finances half of these klowns.” – commenting on Saudi funding of political actors.
• Steve Bannon: “Lincoln… unlimited power to fight the enemy.” – drawing a historical analogy for executive authority.

Some Context

• Haberman piece – Refers to reporting by journalist Michael Haberman, often covering Trump‑related political developments.
• KSA – Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, a major oil‑rich nation whose foreign policy and financing are frequently scrutinized in U.S. politics.
• MBS (mbs‑oy) – Mohammed bin Salman, the Saudi Crown Prince, implicated in regional power plays and alleged funding of foreign actors.
• Textualist argument – A legal interpretive method that limits constitutional analysis to the text’s ordinary meaning, used here to challenge a national‑emergency claim.
• Trump inaugural committee – The organization that planned Donald Trump’s Jan 20, 2017 inauguration; it became the subject of a federal subpoena for documents.

Steve Bannon Coordinates Private Flight and Dinner Plans via iMessage

Key Facts

• Bannon seeks a private plane to collect him in Rome, targeting a post‑noon launch. He asks “Anytime tomorrow after 1 p.m.” and later confirms “Can launch any time after noon” before noting the aircraft won’t be ready until Tuesday, offering to pay for a charter if needed [1].
• Media appearances are woven into the travel logistics. Bannon references “CNBC from here” and “Squawk Box,” indicating he plans to appear on those programs around 11:30 a.m. [1].
• Pilots are occupied loading data, prompting a call for commercial backup. He writes “You should organize commercial backup as pilots are still loading data” and later acknowledges “pilots are still loading data” while the plane remains delayed [1].
• Bannon mentions ongoing meetings with “The League” and French officials. A message notes “Tm in meetings with The League here until then” and later he says he is “in the Elysee” and “now at the pyramid with the entire govt,” suggesting coordination with French political circles [1].
• Dinner arrangements are set for the following day. He proposes “My guys can pick you up. Come for dinner” and later confirms “Dinner tomorrow?” with a timestamp of 10:39 p.m. [1].
• Multiple EFTA codes appear as message identifiers throughout the exchange. Entries such as “EFTA01615683” and “EFTA01615690” label individual messages, tracking the conversation’s progression [1].

Who Said What

• Steve Bannon – “Cool—standby.” (Indicates willingness to wait for the plane’s readiness.)
• Steve Bannon – “My guys can pick you up. Come for dinner.” (Offers transportation and a dinner meeting.)
• Steve Bannon – “You should organize commercial backup as pilots are still loading data.” (Suggests alternative logistics due to pilot workload.)

Some Context

• EFTA codes – Internal reference numbers used in the iMessage thread to label each message for tracking.
• Squawk Box – A CNBC morning business news program; Bannon’s mention implies a scheduled appearance.
• The League – Likely a political or advisory group Bannon is meeting with; the exact nature is not detailed in the messages.
• Elysee – The official residence of the French President; Bannon’s reference suggests he is in proximity to French leadership.
• Pyramid – Possibly a reference to a notable location in France (e.g., the Louvre’s pyramid) where government officials were gathered.

Steve Bannon’s iMessage Log Details Travel, Security Meeting and Border‑Wall Plans

Key Facts

• Bannon juggled a May 2019 itinerary across Europe and the U.S. – Messages record departures from Cannes, arrivals in Paris, a landing from Kazakhstan, and scheduled flights from New York on the morning of the 14th, showing a rapid sequence of international moves [1].
• He met a senior state‑security official after the White House. – Bannon wrote “spent a lot of time with the general in charge of state security post WH,” indicating a debrief with a high‑ranking security figure following his return to the United States [1].
• A multi‑week Middle‑East and North‑Africa tour was outlined. – He listed “6 weeks Paris Saudi Morocco” after a stint on an island from the 3rd to the 10th, suggesting a prolonged diplomatic or fundraising circuit in the region [1].
• Bannon discussed a secret New Mexico border‑wall segment. – He described “My wall dude—New Mexico—right outside El Paso in total secret,” noting a one‑mile connector between two 21‑mile sections that critics claimed “could never be built” [1].
• Political triggers for a June push were identified. – He linked a potential surge of activity to “Boris Johnson wins plus Horowitz report plus Deuts­h bank doc plus Michael’s book,” and said he had asked “Peter for Eric contact,” implying coordination with allies on upcoming events [1].
• Key operatives and a memorial project were mentioned. – Bannon referenced “Kobach and Kolfage on site” and a “construction guy as national heroes,” adding that a memorial would start Friday after courts close and finish Monday at noon, indicating a parallel public‑relations effort [1].

Who Said What

• Steve Bannon: “Yes, thanks; spent a lot of time with the general in charge of state security post WH.” – Confirms a meeting with a senior security official.
• Steve Bannon: “Can’t; have Kobach and Kolfage on site.” – Indicates involvement of two political figures in a project.
• Steve Bannon: “My wall dude—New Mexico—right outside El Paso in total secret.” – Describes a covert border‑wall construction effort.

Some Context

• Kobach: Former Kansas secretary of state and immigration‑policy advocate who has promoted strict border measures.
• Kolfage: Likely refers to a political operative or consultant associated with right‑wing projects; the name appears in Bannon’s messages without further detail.
• Horowitz report: A document produced by the Office of the Inspector General, often cited by conservatives as evidence of alleged misconduct in government agencies.
• Deuts­h bank doc: A reference to a leaked or internal document from a German financial institution, used by Bannon to suggest financial leverage or scandal.
• Memorial: A planned commemorative installation mentioned as beginning after court closures, suggesting a symbolic or fundraising event tied to Bannon’s broader agenda.

Richard Branson and Jeffrey Epstein Exchange Business and Personal Plans in 2013 Emails

Key Facts

• Branson references a recent meeting and watersports – In an email dated September 11, 2013, Richard Branson writes that it was “really nice seeing you yesterday” and mentions “Watersports” that “can’t stop speaking about it” [1].
• Branson proposes a PR angle involving Bill Gates – He suggests Epstein could claim he “has been a brilliant advisor to” Bill Gates, acknowledges a past mistake “sleeping with a 17‑year‑old woman,” and asserts that “you have done nothing that’s against the law since” [1].
• Branson notes his UK travel and seeks transaction ideas – He states he will be in the United Kingdom the week of September 20, 2013, copies Peter Norris, and asks for “3 similar transaction you’d recommend today” [1].
• Branson seeks global data for currency and oil trading – He writes that they need “all the Information … worldwide to trade currencies and trade oil” and asks for recommendations of contacts to start looking for [1].
• Epstein mentions the Nobel Peace Prize committee head – In his reply, Epstein says the head of the Nobel Peace Prize committee, Thorborn Jagland, will stay in New York with him the week of September 20 and suggests Branson might find him “interesting” [1].
• Epstein describes a recent oil options trade and asks for quants – He notes a prior “cashless transaction” that bought out‑of‑the‑money oil calls and sold out‑of‑the‑money puts, calls it “not bad,” and requests Branson’s team find “quants that will search the data” [1].

Who Said What

• Jeffrey Epstein – “nice seeing YOU” (thanks Branson for hospitality).
• Jeffrey Epstein – “the head of the Nobel Peace Prize committee Thorborn Jagland will be staying in ny with me the week of the ZOth sept if you are there you might find him interesting” (suggests a potential meeting).
• Jeffrey Epstein – “The previous trade was buying out of the money calls on oil and selling out of the money for a cashless transcaction. not bad )-” (describes a recent options trade).
• Richard Branson – “It was really nice seeing you yesterday: The in Watersports can't stop speaking about itl time” (comments on their recent encounter).

Some Context

• Out‑of‑the‑money calls – Options contracts giving the right to buy an asset at a price above the current market; they have no intrinsic value until the price rises above the strike.
• Quants – Quantitative analysts who use mathematical models and data analysis to develop trading strategies; Epstein asks for such experts to examine market data.
• Nobel Peace Prize committee – The body that selects Nobel Peace Prize laureates; its head, Thorborn Jagland, is mentioned as a potential contact.
• Cashless transaction – A trade executed without exchanging cash upfront, often using offsetting positions or derivatives.
• Peter Norris – Individual copied on Branson’s email, presumably a colleague involved in financial transactions.

Peggy Siegal Forwards Email Linking Katie Couric to Jeffrey Epstein Invitation

Key Facts

• Email chain dated March 2 2011 forwarded by Peggy Siegal – The message was sent on Wed 3/2/2011 at 2:00:40 AM from Peggy Siegal to two variations of a jeevacation@gmail address, with the subject “Fw: Katie Couric”【1】.
• Siegal urges investigation of an unnamed issue – In her brief note Siegal writes “I da think you Tleed to invesligale what is going on, There is a witeh humt going (#gainst Y( arel Andrew. YOu need W ahead o[ this.” indicating she believes further inquiry is required【1】.
• Original message from Katie Couric mentions a Jeffrey Epstein invitation – Couric’s reply to Siegal, timestamped “Tuz Mar W[ 20.24.25 20I”, thanks Siegal for “the Jeffrey Epstein invite” and says it “brought me a world of trouble”【1】.
• Couric includes cryptic reference numbers – The email ends with strings “EFTA_R1_00490086” and “EFTA01995716”, which appear to be internal reference identifiers【1】.
• The email contains multiple typographical errors and garbled text – Both Siegal’s and Couric’s messages feature misspellings, misplaced brackets, and nonsensical fragments, suggesting the content may have been corrupted or hastily typed【1】.
• No clear resolution or follow‑up is provided – The forwarded email ends abruptly without further explanation, leaving the nature of the “white humt” or the alleged trouble undefined【1】.

Who Said What

• Katie Couric, journalist – “thanks for the Jeffrey Epstein invite… it brought me a world of trouble.”
• Peggy Siegal, publicist – “I da think you Tleed to invesligale what is going on… You need W ahead of this.”

Some Context

• Jeffrey Epstein – Financier convicted of sex‑trafficking crimes; his name appears in the email as the source of an invitation that Couric claims caused “trouble.”
• Peggy Siegal – Long‑time media publicist known for representing high‑profile journalists and authors; she is the sender of the forwarded email.
• Katie Couric – Prominent television journalist and news anchor; the recipient of the alleged Epstein invitation.
• EFTA reference numbers – Likely internal tracking codes (e.g., “EFTA_R1_00490086”) used by an organization or system to catalog correspondence; their exact meaning is not explained in the email.

Email Exchange on Oct 15 2012 Mentions Oslo Trip, Weather, and Personal Matters

Key Facts

• Email sent Oct 15 2012, 2:01 PM from A.K.H. Kronprinsessen – The message was addressed to “[email protected]” and “Jeffrey Epstein” and logged at 2.01.15 PM on Monday, Oct 15 2012 [1].
• Subject line asks about Oslo travel – The header reads “Re: Coming to Oslo ?”, indicating the correspondence concerns a possible visit to Norway’s capital [1].
• Body references freezing weather, Paris, and a “wife hunt” – The sender mentions “Freezing Snow yesterday”, “Paris”, “adultery”, “Scandis better wif material”, and writes “Iam On1 my wife hunt: is proving interesting but i scandinavians”, suggesting personal or illicit context [1].
• Includes a standard confidentiality disclaimer – The email states the communication may be attorney‑client privileged, may contain inside information, and warns against unauthorized use or copying [1].
• Contains reference numbers EFTA_RI00544981 and EFTA02033693 – These identifiers appear near the end of the message, possibly relating to case or file tracking [1].
• Prior message from “Jeffrey Epstein” asks about weather – An earlier line dated 15.47 on Oct 15 2012 shows “Jeffrey Epstein” writing “what is the wcather”, linking the exchange to a weather query [1].

Who Said What

• Jeffrey Epstein – “what is the wcather” (question about weather) [1].
• A.K.H. Kronprinsessen – “Iam On1 my wife hunt: is proving interesting but i scandinavians” (personal remark) [1].
• A.K.H. Kronprinsessen (disclaimer) – “The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney‑client privileged, may constitute inside information…” (legal warning) [1].

Some Context

• Attorney‑client privilege – A legal protection that keeps communications between a lawyer and client confidential, preventing disclosure without consent.
• EFTA – The European Free Trade Association; the codes EFTA_RI00544981 and EFTA02033693 likely reference internal tracking numbers within that framework.
• Oslo – Capital city of Norway; the email’s subject suggests a planned visit or discussion about traveling there.

Jeffrey Epstein Invites Apollo Executive to Private Breakfast with Bill Gates, 2014 Email Revealed

Key Facts

• Epstein extended private breakfast invitation to Apollo’s Josh Harris – An email dated November 26, 2014 from an unnamed sender to Lisa Joyce and Josh Harris states that Jeffrey Epstein wants to invite Harris to a breakfast in December at Epstein’s New York home, with Bill Gates also attending, and limited to fewer than six guests [1].
• Bill Gates slated to attend intimate gathering – The same message notes that Bill Gates will be present at the breakfast, emphasizing the event’s exclusive nature and small attendance size, underscoring the high‑profile connections of Epstein’s network [1].
• Location specified as 9 East 71st Street, Manhattan – The invitation provides Epstein’s residence address as “9 East 71st Street between SE and Madison Place,” indicating the meeting would occur at his Manhattan townhouse [1].
• Apollo staff reassigned as primary contacts for Harris – In a separate internal memo dated December 1, 2014, Lisa Joyce, executive assistant to Joshua Harris, informs Rose Parkl and Echo Blumi that they will serve as point‑of‑contact for Harris, handling calendar and meeting requests, and should be copied on related emails [1].
• Confidentiality disclaimer attached to the invitation – The email concludes with a standard confidentiality notice warning that the content is privileged and should not be disclosed or disseminated, reflecting the sensitivity of the correspondence [1].
• Apollo Global Management identifiers listed in footer – The message footer includes “Apollo Global Management, LLC” along with reference numbers EFTA_RI00884846 and EFTA02089833, indicating internal tracking or compliance codes for the firm’s communications [1].

Who Said What

• Email sender (unnamed): “Jeffrey Epstein would like to invite Josh …” – conveys Epstein’s request for a breakfast meeting with Harris and Gates.

Some Context

• Apollo Global Management – A leading private‑equity firm; Joshua Harris is a co‑founder and senior executive, making his involvement noteworthy.
• Jeffrey Epstein – Financier convicted of sex‑trafficking offenses, known for cultivating relationships with wealthy and influential individuals.
• Josh Harris – Co‑founder of Apollo Global Management and prominent figure in private‑equity and sports ownership.
• Executive assistant – Administrative professional who manages schedules, communications, and logistical details for senior executives; Lisa Joyce fulfills this role for Harris.
• Confidentiality notice – Standard legal disclaimer used in corporate emails to protect privileged information and restrict unauthorized distribution.

Howard Howward Coordinates Caribbean Yacht Trip with Jeff and Lehrman Family

Key Facts

• Howard Howward plans arrival in St. Thomas Saturday Howard writes that his party will land in St. Thomas early Saturday afternoon and intends to travel to St. Bart’s or Anguilla on Monday while asking Jeff for a Sunday evening dinner confirmation [1].
• Group includes two couples and eight children The email lists Howard, Jeff, another couple Michael and Marcy Lehrman, and each family has four children ranging from ages 7 to 16, indicating a sizable party for the yacht trip [1].
• Request for exact docking location Howard asks Jeff for the precise location of his boat’s captain to ensure proper navigation and docking arrangements for the Sunday evening dinner [1].
• Proposed Sunday evening dinner Howard suggests meeting for dinner on Sunday evening and seeks Jeff’s approval of the timing [1].
• Reference to “Little St. James” Jeff’s earlier note mentions “little St. James on the map, behind Christmas Cove,” suggesting a possible rendezvous point or landmark for the group [1].
• Email ends with Cantor Fitzgerald disclaimer The message includes a standard confidentiality notice from Cantor Fitzgerald, noting virus screening, liability limits, and regulatory monitoring of email communications [1].

Who Said What

• Howard Howward – “We are landing in St: Thomas early Saturday afternoon and planning to head over to St Bart's/Anguilla on Monday at some point… Does Sunday evening for dinner sound good?” (email, Dec 19 2012)
• Jeff – “come sat or sunday lunch? little st james on the map, behind christmans cove” (email excerpt)

Some Context

• St. Thomas – U.S. Virgin Islands island, common entry point for Caribbean yacht charters.
• St. Bart’s (Saint Barthélemy) – French Caribbean island known for upscale tourism, often visited after St. Thomas.
• Anguilla – British Overseas Territory in the Caribbean, a frequent destination for private yachts.
• Cantor Fitzgerald – Global financial services firm; its disclaimer indicates the sender’s affiliation and standard email security practices.

Howard Lutnick Invited to Lunch on JE’s Island, Dec 2012

Key Facts

• Invitation sent to Howard Lutnick for weekend lunch – An email dated December 20, 2012, at 1:00 PM asks whether Howard Lutnick can meet for lunch on Saturday or Sunday on JE’s island, indicating a scheduling request for the weekend. [1]
• Sender and recipient details omitted – The message header lists generic fields “To:” and “From:” without specifying names, suggesting internal or informal communication where participants are known by context. [1]
• Subject line labeled “Alert” – The email’s subject line reads “Alert,” implying the sender considered the lunch invitation time‑sensitive or noteworthy within the correspondence chain. [1]
• Reference codes included at bottom – Two identifiers, EFTA_R1_00818090 and EFTA02152992, appear at the end of the note, likely serving as internal tracking or filing numbers for the organization’s records. [1]
• Abbreviated signatures and initials – The note contains fragments such as “FH,” “cam,” “dd,” “Cn,” and “JF 9,” which appear to be shorthand for senders, recipients, or related parties, though their exact meanings are not clarified. [1]

Some Context

• Howard Lutnick – Founder and CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, a global financial services firm; his involvement often signals high‑level business or personal engagements.
• JE’s island – Refers to a private or exclusive location owned or frequented by an individual identified only as “JE,” used here as the proposed venue for the lunch.
• EFTA codes – Internal reference numbers (e.g., EFTA_R1_00818090) likely used by the organization’s document management system for tracking correspondence.

Jeffrey Epstein Dinner Invitation Circulates Among Dick Cavett’s Staff

Key Facts

• Invitation extended to Dick Cavett and Martha for a dinner with Jeffrey Epstein and celebrity guests – On January 20 2017 at 4:19 PM, an email from “Disa_Jeffrey” asked whether Dick and Martha were in town and said Jeffrey was having a dinner that night with Woody Allen, Soon Yi, Jim and Liz Natson, expressing a desire for them to attend [1].
• Executive assistant Lisa Troland reminded Martha of the invitation and awaited her reply – Earlier that morning, Lisa Troland wrote to Lesley that she had reminded Martha the previous night and that Martha had promised to respond by email later that day [1].
• Staff exchanged multiple follow‑up messages about a budget tied to Jeffrey Epstein – Between January 11 and January 20 2017, Lisa Troland sent several emails to Dick Cavett and others inquiring about the status of a detailed budget related to Jeffrey Epstein [1].
• Martha indicated she would provide budget information by end of day on January 18 – An email dated January 18 2017 9:59 AM noted that Martha said she would have something ready by EOD [1].
• Lisa Troland reported waiting for feedback from the team handling the budget – On January 11 2017 1:52 PM, she wrote that reminders had been sent and the staff were still awaiting responses from the colleagues responsible for the budget [1].
• The dinner invitation remained active in the latest email, confirming the event for that evening – The final message on January 20 2017 4:19 PM reiterated the dinner plans and the hope that Dick and Martha could join [1].

Who Said What

• Disa_Jeffrey (sender of the invitation) – Stated that Jeffrey Epstein was hosting a dinner with notable guests and expressed a wish for Dick Cavett and Martha to attend.
• Lisa Troland (Executive Assistant to Dick Cavett) – Reported reminding Martha about the invitation, tracking budget progress, and awaiting replies from the budget team.

Some Context

• Jeffrey Epstein – A financier who faced multiple criminal investigations and convictions for sexual offenses; his social events often involved high‑profile guests.
• Dick Cavett – Prominent American television talk‑show host known for his long‑running interview programs.
• Executive Assistant – A senior administrative professional who manages schedules, communications, and logistical details for executives.

Sergey Brin Confirms Mid‑April New York Visit and Dinner Plans with Gmax and Team

Key Facts

• Sergey Brin finalizes NY trip dates mid‑April 2003 – He will be in New York on the 15th (after 8 a.m.) and early on the 11th (until 2 p.m.), noting his schedule is relatively unblocked and asking Gmax to confirm what works for Gmax and Jeffrey [1].
• Gmax confirms the dates and offers a casual dinner at Jeffrey’s house – In an email dated April 3, 2003, Gmax says the date works, mentions dinner at Jeffrey’s as “always happily casual,” and looks forward to seeing Sergey [1].
• Sergey’s earlier reply listed tentative arrival windows of April 10‑11 and possibly late April 15‑16 – On April 2, 2003, he apologized for the late response, said plans were not finalized, and indicated he might be in New York on April 10 and 11, with later dates still uncertain [1].
• Gmax later changes the dinner venue to Jeffrey’s house on the 1st, calling it a different, more fun event – An email from April 25, 2003 notes the dinner has been moved to Jeffrey’s house on the 1st, describes it as a different dinner, and hopes Sergey will still be in town and able to attend [1].
• CEQ Eric will be in New York, and Sergey offers to invite him – Sergey mentions that CEQ Eric will be around and that he would be happy to invite him, though Eric’s schedule may be a bit more packed [1].
• Ghislaine and Lesley are included as additional participants – Sergey’s initial email is addressed to Ghislaine and Lesley, indicating they are part of the planned gathering [1].

Who Said What

• Sergey Brin: “I have finally finalized my trip and plan to be in NY on the 15th (after 8) and early on the 11th (until 2) and am relatively unblocked… Let me know what works for you and Jeffrey… CEQ Eric will be around and I’ll be happy to invite him.”
• Gmax: “No problem, hope the date works… dinner at Jeffrey’s always happily casual… look forward to seeing you.”
• Sergey Brin (earlier): “Sorry for the late response… I still haven’t finalized my plans… I’ll be there on Apr 10, 11… possibly late on Apr 15 and of Apr 16 but still in the air.”
• Gmax (later): “The dinner I mentioned has now been changed to a dinner at Jeffrey’s house on the 1st… it is a different dinner and I think it will be more fun. Hope you will still be in and able.”

Some Context

• CEQ Eric: Refers to Eric Schmidt, who served as Google’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) during the early 2000s; his presence in New York is relevant to the meeting’s agenda.
• Jeffrey’s house: Likely the residence of a mutual acquaintance (possibly Jeffrey Skoll, a known early Google employee and philanthropist), used as a casual venue for gatherings among Google leadership.

Leaked 2012 Emails Reveal Elon Musk Coordinating Island Party with Jeffrey Epstein

Key Facts

• Elon Musk emailed Jeffrey Epstein about party timing – Musk asked “What day/night will be the wildest party on =our island?” on November 25, 2012, indicating coordination for a social event on an island they shared [1].
• Epstein inquired about helicopter capacity for island guests – Epstein replied on November 24, 2012, asking “how many people will you be for the heli to island,” showing logistical planning for transport to the party [1].
• Emails contain confidentiality and attorney‑client privilege disclaimer – The message includes a notice that the communication is confidential, may be privileged, and unauthorized use could be unlawful, highlighting the sensitivity of the exchange [1].
• Technical metadata embedded in the email suggests data tracking – An XML/Plist block lists timestamps, IDs, and reference numbers such as “EFTA_R1_01359813” and “EFTA02364941,” indicating internal record‑keeping by the email system [1].
• The correspondence predates later public scrutiny of both figures – Dated November 2012, the emails precede the 2019 revelations about Epstein’s crimes and Musk’s later public profile, providing early evidence of their association [1].

Who Said What

• Elon Musk – “What day/night will be the wildest party on =our island?” (email to Epstein, 25 Nov 2012).
• Jeffrey Epstein – “how many people will you be for the heli to island” (email to Musk, 24 Nov 2012).

Some Context

• Heli – Short for helicopter; used here to transport guests to the island venue.
• Attorney‑client privileged – Legal protection that keeps communications between a client and lawyer confidential; the disclaimer claims the email may fall under this protection.
• Plist (Property List) – An Apple‑format file used to store structured data; the email includes a Plist block containing timestamps and IDs.
• EFTA_R1_01359813 / EFTA02364941 – Reference numbers embedded in the metadata, likely internal identifiers for the email or related records.
• Confidentiality notice – Standard legal language warning that the email is intended only for the recipient and that unauthorized disclosure may be unlawful.

Josh Harris’s Confidential Email to Jeffrey E Discusses Breakfast Invitation and Includes Metadata

Key Facts

• Email confirms Harris appreciated invitation and attended breakfast – The message from Josh Harris reads “Yes very much: Thank Vou for inviting me:” indicating he attended and enjoyed the breakfast invitation from Jeffrey E. The email timestamp shows it was sent on Saturday, December 13, 2014 at 1:08 PM. [1]
• Jeffrey E’s earlier query asked about breakfast enjoyment – In a prior line dated December 13, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Jeffrey E wrote “did vou hve fun at breakfast” prompting Harris’s reply. The informal spelling reflects a casual exchange. [1]
• Email contains extensive confidentiality disclaimer – The body includes a standard notice stating the communication may be attorney‑client privileged, contain inside information, and is prohibited from unauthorized use, copying, or disclosure, with instructions to delete if received in error. [1]
• Technical metadata embedded in Apple plist format appears in the email – The message includes XML‑like entries such as “1418476054” and “<string 463464” along with identifiers like “EFTA_RI01440810” and “EFTA02402793”, suggesting system‑generated tracking data. [1]
• Reference to Apollo Global Management, LLC appears in the footer – The disclaimer mentions “Apollo Global Management; LLC,” indicating the sender’s affiliation or the entity responsible for the email’s legal notice. [1]
• Email timestamps show a discrepancy between send and reply times – The header lists the email sent at 1:08 PM, while the quoted query from Jeffrey E is timestamped 2:01 PM, implying the reply was drafted earlier or the timestamps are misordered. [1]

Who Said What

• Josh Harris – “Yes very much: Thank Vou for inviting me:” (expresses gratitude for the breakfast invitation).
• Jeffrey E – “did vou hve fun at breakfast” (asks whether Harris enjoyed the breakfast).

Some Context

• Attorney‑client privileged – Legal protection that bars disclosure of communications between a lawyer and their client.
• Apple plist – Property list file format used by Apple software to store structured data; appears here as XML metadata.
• EFTA codes (e.g., EFTA_RI01440810) – Internal reference numbers likely used for tracking or filing within the organization.
• Apollo Global Management, LLC – A private‑equity firm; its name in the disclaimer suggests the email originates from its corporate environment.

Jeffrey E Emails Deepak Chopra with Unclear Dinner Query and Confidentiality Notice

Key Facts

• Email sent by Jeffrey E to Deepak Chopra on Aug 18, 2016 – The message originated from [email protected], was timestamped Thursday, August 18, 2016 9:34 AM, and addressed Deepak Chopra directly [1].
• Message contains informal, unclear request about meeting plans – The body asks “when are Vou in new vork, do you think /=o dicaprio would want to have dinner with woody,” a garbled sentence that appears to inquire about scheduling and a celebrity dinner [1].
• Email includes standard confidentiality disclaimer – The notice warns the communication may be attorney‑client privileged, may contain inside information, is intended only for the addressee, and prohibits unauthorized use, directing accidental recipients to notify the sender and destroy the email [1].
• Technical metadata appended to email body – Embedded identifiers such as conversation‑id 72243, date‑received 1471512830, remote‑id 637216, and codes EFTA_R1_01557611 and EFTA02455176 suggest internal tracking or filing systems [1].
• No clear business or legal context provided – The email does not explain who “Vou” or “new vork” refers to, nor the relevance of the Leonardo DiCaprio‑Woody dinner question, leaving the purpose ambiguous [1].

Who Said What

• Jeffrey E (sender) – “when are Vou in new vork, do you think /=o dicaprio would want to have dinner with woody” – a direct query about scheduling and a potential dinner with Leonardo DiCaprio and “Woody” (likely a reference to Woody Allen or another figure) [1].

Some Context

• Attorney‑client privilege – A legal doctrine that protects confidential communications between a lawyer and their client from disclosure, cited in the email’s disclaimer.
• Inside information – Non‑public material information that could affect a party’s decisions, also referenced in the confidentiality notice.
• EFTA reference codes – Likely internal identifiers (e.g., EFTA_R1_01557611) used for tracking or categorizing the email within an organization’s system; not necessarily related to the European Free Trade Association.

Deepak Chopra and Jeffrey E. Email Exchange on Meetings, Book Promotion, and Personal Stories (July 2016)

Key Facts

• Email chain coordinates FaceTime and Skype meetings in July 2016 – The messages show Deepak Chopra proposing FaceTime and Skype calls, offering times like 2 PM, 12 noon, and next‑day afternoons, while Jeffrey E. shares his Skype ID and availability from Florida and a ranch in Santa Fe. [1]
• Discussion promotes Chopra’s book “Super Genes” with Amazon link – Both parties repeatedly reference the title Super Genes: Unlock the Astonishing Power of Your DNA for Optimum Health and Wellbeing and include the same Amazon URL, indicating the email thread was used to publicize the publication. [1]
• Personal anecdotes about a friend’s shoe‑related incident and a pregnancy bet – Jeffrey mentions a story where a friend stole high heels and “had sex with shoes,” and also recounts a claim that a woman told “Donald” she was pregnant, lost a $10,000 bet, and sent a truck of baby food. [1]
• Reference to a Harvard program on perception and human‑robot interaction – Deepak notes an “interesting session up at Harvard” covering perception, language, and human‑robot interaction, suggesting a professional context for their conversation. [1]
• Repeated confidentiality notices dominate later emails – The final messages contain multiple boilerplate statements that the communication is confidential, attorney‑client privileged, and may contain inside information, warning against unauthorized disclosure. [1]
• Mention of Marla Maples and possible personal connection – Deepak asks Jeffrey if he knows Marla Maples, indicating a personal or networking element within the exchange. [1]

Who Said What

• Deepak Chopra: “Let'$ connect ZPM FaceTime is easier as will be out.” – Proposes a FaceTime call.
• Deepak Chopra: “FaceTime may be easier.” – Suggests using FaceTime for communication.
• Deepak Chopra: “Can Skype this afternoon or tomorrow afternoon.” – Offers a Skype meeting.
• Deepak Chopra: “Im available after 2 PM tomorrow if you have time ability and desire =ora cup pf coffee.” – Sets a specific meeting time and informal coffee invitation.
• Deepak Chopra: “do you know Marla Maples? Anything we share is between US share nothing with anyone but trust you.” – Inquires about a personal connection and stresses confidentiality.
• Jeffrey E.: “no imean her friend was stealing her =igh heels cutting the backs of the shoes open and fuckin= the shoe its a funny story.” – Describes a bizarre anecdote about a friend and shoes.
• Jeffrey E.: “when she told donald she was pregnant losta 10k dolla= bet with and sent him a truck of baby food.” – Relays a claim involving a pregnancy, a bet, and baby‑food shipment.
• Jeffrey E.: “my skype is jeevacation or‑nbsp; we can facetime if you prefer. does 12pm &nb-p; 1 work for vou?” – Provides contact details and proposes meeting times.

Some Context

• ZPM – Likely an internal shorthand or typo in the email; its exact meaning is unclear from the exchange.
• Marla Maples – Former actress and former spouse of former U.S. President Donald Trump; mentioned here as a possible mutual acquaintance.
• Harvard program on perception and human‑robot interaction – Refers to an academic session at Harvard University covering how humans perceive and interact with robots, indicating a scholarly interest of the participants.
• EFTA_R1_01559620 (and similar codes) – Repeated reference numbers that appear to be internal tracking or filing identifiers within the email system; they do not convey substantive content to the reader.
• Confidentiality notice – Standard legal disclaimer stating the email may be privileged or contain inside information, warning recipients against unauthorized use.

Allison Lutnick Schedules Lunch Visit with Lesley Groff via Boat “Excellence”

Key Facts

• Allison Lutnick confirms morning departure from Caneel – In a December 21, 2012 email, Lutnick tells Lesley Groff her party will leave Caneel that morning aboard the vessel named Excellence and seeks lunch details [1].
• Group includes two families, eight children and two girls – The message notes two families each have four kids aged 7‑16, plus two additional girls, making ten minors in the party [1].
• Proposed lunch time is 1:00 p.m. or 1:30 p.m. on Sunday – Lutnick asks whether a 1 p.m. or 1:30 p.m. lunch on Sunday would work and requests the exact docking location for the boat [1].
• Lesley Groff asks Jefffrey Epstein to coordinate the visit – Groff forwards the request, asking Epstein to “refer the Lutnick’s and entire clan at 1 or 1:30 on Sunday,” indicating she is handling the scheduling [1].
• Boat registration numbers EFTA_R1_01659498 and EFTA02521951 are listed – The email includes two codes, likely vessel identifiers for Excellence and its captain, to aid coordination [1].
• Multiple recipients and carbon copies are included – The original message was sent to Jefffrey Epstein with a cc, and the forwarded note copies “vexcll@aolcom” and “Gilbert Matthew,” showing a broader distribution [1].

Who Said What

• Allison Lutnick (sender) – “We are looking forward to visiting you… We would love to join you for lunch… Please advise on timing and exactly where our boat should go.”
• Lesley Groff (forwarder) – “do you refer the Lutnick’s and entire clan at 1 or 1:30 on Sunday?”

Some Context

• Caneel – The departure point mentioned; likely a resort or marina in the Caribbean used as a launch location for private vessels.
• Excellence – Name of the private boat that will transport the Lutnick party; such vessels often require advance docking arrangements.
• EFTA numbers – Identification codes (e.g., EFTA_R1_01659498) commonly used for vessel registration and tracking under maritime authorities.
• Lesley Groff – Individual coordinating the visit, acting as an intermediary between the Lutnick family and Jefffrey Epstein.
• Jefffrey Epstein – Recipient of the original email, presumably a contact who can facilitate the meeting logistics.

Email Shows Jeffrey Epstein Requested Martha Stewart’s Cell Number in 2013

Key Facts

• Lesley Groff emailed Jeffrey Epstein on Dec 19 2013 Lesley Groff sent an email to Jeffrey Epstein at 8:05 PM on Thursday, December 19, 2013, with the subject “Martha Stewant,” indicating a communication about Martha Stewart’s contact information [1].
• Assistant sought to exchange cell numbers The message states that Martha Stewart’s assistant wanted to pass Martha’s cell phone number to Epstein and also requested Epstein’s cell number for Stewart, showing a direct request for personal contact details [1].
• Stewart scheduled to be on St. Croix Dec 23 The email notes that Martha Stewart would be on St. Croix starting December 23, providing a timeline for the intended contact and possible meeting location [1].
• Permission sought to share Stewart’s number Groff asks Epstein, “Ok to give Martha Stewart your cell #?” indicating that Epstein’s consent was required before sharing his number with Stewart [1].
• Email includes garbled iPhone XML data The body contains malformed XML/Plist code and numeric strings such as “EFTA_R1_01752494” and “EFTA02578624,” suggesting the email was sent from an iPhone and included metadata artifacts [1].
• No response or outcome recorded The email ends abruptly with “you:” and does not contain any reply or confirmation, leaving the exchange unresolved in the record [1].

Who Said What

(No direct quotations appear in the email.)

Some Context

• St. Croix – An island in the U.S. Virgin Islands where Martha Stewart was scheduled to be on December 23, 2013, possibly for a personal or business visit.
• Plist (Property List) – A data format used by Apple devices; the email’s garbled XML suggests it was generated by an iPhone’s messaging system, resulting in raw metadata appearing in the message.
• EFTA codes – Strings like “EFTA_R1_01752494” appear in the email’s technical footer; while their exact meaning is unclear, they likely represent internal identifiers from the email client or device.

Email Chain Reveals Concerns Over Legal Representation for Donald

Key Facts

• May 28 2017 email chain discusses Donald’s legal representation challenges – The messages, dated May 28 2017, show Jeffrey E. emailing LHS about difficulties law firms face when considering representation of Donald, noting repeated rejections. [1]
• Kaslowitz reportedly turned down by multiple firms – Jeffrey writes that “Kaslowitz is getting turned down repeatedly by firms unwilling to represent Donald,” indicating a reluctance within the legal community. [1]
• Gorelick criticized for representing Jared – The email claims “world thinks poorly of Gorelick for representing Jared,” suggesting reputational damage for the attorney linked to Jared. [1]
• Speculation about Russian financial leverage and election interference – The correspondence lists “Russians having financial leverage” and “Russians helping in Election w complicity = his campaign plausible but not certain,” reflecting uncertainty about foreign influence. [1]
• Confidentiality and attorney‑client privilege notices included – Both messages contain standard legal disclaimers stating the content is confidential, may be privileged, and unauthorized use is prohibited. [1]
• Reference numbers EFTA_R1_01888596‑98 appear in the emails – The emails list case identifiers such as EFTA_R1_01888596, EFTA02649146, and similar numbers, suggesting internal tracking of related matters. [1]

Who Said What

• Jeffrey E.: “Kaslowitz is getting turned down repeatedly by firms unwilling to represent Donald.” – Expresses concern over the lawyer’s ability to secure representation.
• Jeffrey E.: “World thinks poorly of Gorelick for representing Jared.” – Comments on public perception of the attorney.
• Jeffrey E.: “Russians having financial leverage… Russians helping in Election w complicity = his campaign plausible but not certain.” – Speculates on possible foreign influence in the campaign.

Some Context

• Kaslowitz – Likely a lawyer (e.g., Michael Kaslowitz) mentioned as seeking to represent Donald but facing firm rejections.
• Gorelick – Attorney referenced for representing Jared (presumably Jared Kushner), facing criticism in the email.
• POTU – Acronym for President of the United States, used in the correspondence.
• EFTA_R1_01888596 – Internal reference or case number, possibly related to legal filings or investigations mentioned in the emails.
• LHS – The email’s recipient; identity not clarified, possibly a colleague or associate.

Hillary Clinton Fundraising Event Scheduled at Cantor Fitzgerald for November 11, 2015

Key Facts

• Invitation sent to attend intimate Clinton fundraiser – Lesley Groff forwarded a message on November 3, 2015 inviting Jefffrey Epstein to a one‑hour fundraising event with Hillary Clinton at Cantor Fitzgerald on November 11, 2015, from 5:30 PM to 6:30 PM, and requested an RSVP [1].
• Event hosted at Cantor Fitzgerald offices – The gathering was to take place at the New York offices of Cantor Fitzgerald, a financial services firm that frequently hosts political fundraisers, providing a venue for donors to meet the candidate directly [1].
• Three separate intimate sessions mentioned – The forwarded email notes “3 very intimate fundraising event” with Clinton, suggesting multiple small‑group sessions were planned, though only one time slot is listed in the invitation [1].
• Contribution forms and donation IDs attached – Attachments included a contribution form and two identifiers, EFTA_RI01942413 and EFTA02671545, indicating the paperwork required for donors to record their contributions to the Hillary for America campaign [1].
• Multiple disclosure documents provided – Additional PDFs such as “HFA_Donation_Disclosures” and “HFA_11.11_530_NYC_vZ” were included, likely containing legal disclosures and event details required for compliance with campaign‑finance regulations [1].
• Copy sent to additional staff members – The email CC’d individuals identified as Gilbert Matthew and Christopher Petrock, indicating that other campaign staff were kept informed of the invitation and logistics [1].

Who Said What

• Howard Lutnick: “would like to invite you to attend 3 very intimate fundraising event with Hillary Clinton from 5.30 PM to 6.30 PM at the Cantor Fitzgerald Offices on November 11th. Please RSVP. (Contribution form is attached to this email)” – sender of the forwarded invitation [1].

Some Context

• Cantor Fitzgerald: Global financial services firm whose New York offices are used for political fundraising events, offering a professional setting for donor‑candidate interactions.
• Hillary for America: The official campaign committee for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential run, responsible for collecting and reporting contributions.
• EFTA: Internal reference code (e.g., EFTA_RI01942413) used to track individual donor contributions within the campaign’s accounting system.
• Contribution form: Standardized document donors complete to record the amount, source, and purpose of a political donation, required for Federal Election Commission compliance.

New Batch of Image Files Catalogued Under “Ratner” Released

Key Facts

• Two batches of 17 image files each released under the name Ratner – The document lists two separate groups, each introduced by “Ratner; 1” and containing 17 filenames, totaling 34 files [1].
• Filenames follow DSCO and DSCQ prefixes, suggesting a systematic naming convention – Most entries begin with “DSCO” or “DSCQ,” indicating a consistent pattern across the sets [1].
• Two files labeled EFTA00245476 and EFTA00245477 appear at the end of each batch, possibly indicating related metadata – Each batch concludes with an “EFTA” code, distinct from the DSCO/DSCQ series [1].
• The list includes variations in file extensions and formatting, such as JPG, _JPG, and spaces, indicating inconsistent naming – Entries show mixed use of commas, underscores, and spaces before “JPG,” reflecting non‑uniform file naming [1].
• No descriptive metadata or context provided beyond the filenames, limiting immediate understanding of content – The document contains only the raw filenames without captions, dates, or subject details [1].
• The source document presents the lists without accompanying images or explanations, suggesting a preliminary catalog – The absence of visual previews or narrative implies this is an initial inventory rather than a finished release [1].

Who Said What

(No quotations were included in the source material.)

Jeffrey Epstein Invites Martha Stewart to Dinner with Woody Allen on April 16, 2016

Key Facts

• Email dated April 22, 2016 invites Martha Stewart – Lesley Groff, assistant to Jeffrey Epstein, sent an email on Fri, 22 Apr 2016 19:27:52 +0000 to Martha Stewart, proposing a dinner invitation. [1]
• Jeffrey Epstein plans dinner with Woody Allen and Socn Yi – The email states Epstein is hosting Woody Allen and Socn Yi for dinner on Tuesday, April 16, at his New York residence. [1]
• Location specified as 9 East 7192 Street, between South and Madison – The address given for the dinner is “9 East 7192 Street between Sth and Madiscn” in New York, indicating a private Manhattan address. [1]
• Proposed arrival time around 7:30 p.m. – Groff notes the guests should arrive “around J/7.3Cpm_Still working cn time,” interpreted as approximately 7:30 p.m. for the dinner. [1]
• Lesley requests confirmation of Martha’s availability – The message asks Martha to confirm if she is “around and available” to join the dinner, and to reply to Lesley. [1]
• Email includes internal reference code EFTA00326214 – The signature ends with “EFTA00326214,” likely an internal tracking number for Epstein’s staff communications. [1]

Who Said What

No direct quotations are present in the source email.

Some Context

• EFTA00326214 – An internal reference or case number used by Jeffrey Epstein’s staff to track correspondence.
• Socn Yi – Named in the invitation as a dinner guest; the name appears to be a typographical variation, possibly referring to a known associate or friend of Epstein.

December 2012 Emails Detail Planning of Jeffrey Epstein Island Lunch

Key Facts

• Lesley Groff coordinates lunch on Epstein’s Little St. James island – In an email dated Dec 20, 2012, Groff writes to Matthew Gilbert asking if Howard Lutnick and his family could join Jeffrey Epstein for lunch on Saturday or Sunday, describing the venue as Little St. James near Chrisman’s Cove【1】.
• Gilbert offers flexible availability for the meeting – Gilbert replies that they have time to coordinate, can handle anything that isn’t arranged today or tomorrow, and are even available on weekends, emphasizing quick scheduling【1】.
• Earlier November email requests phone numbers for island contacts – On Nov 20, 2012, Groff emailed Howard Lutnick and others stating that Epstein understands Lutnick will be in St. Thomas, asks to pass along phone numbers, and notes that island contacts are cc’d【1】.
• Emails list senior Cantor Fitzgerald officials as participants – The correspondence references Howard Lutnick, Chairman of Cantor Fitzgerald, his wife Allison Lutnick, and includes Cantor’s New York office address and fax numbers, indicating corporate involvement【1】.
• Confidentiality notice marks the messages as proprietary – Each email carries a disclaimer that the content is confidential, property of Cantor Fitzgerald, and must not be disseminated, reflecting the private nature of the arrangement【1】.
• The chain shows multiple attempts to finalize logistics before holidays – The messages stress urgency, mention “the holidays,” and seek to confirm plans quickly, suggesting the meeting was intended before year‑end travel breaks【1】.

Who Said What

• Lesley Groff: “Jeffrey Epstein understands you will be down in St. Thomas… please pass along some phone numbers.” (email to Howard Lutnick, Nov 20, 2012)【1】.
• Lesley Groff: “Jeffrey is asking if Howard and family could join me on his island for lunch this Sat. or Sun.” (email Dec 20, 2012)【1】.
• Matthew Gilbert: “We still have time to coordinate… we are extremely capable… handle anything we don’t get to today/tomorrow and even available on the weekends.” (email Dec 20, 2012)【1】.
• Howard Lutnick (via email): “I’m fine with you CC‑ing me or forwarding any plans.” (reply quoted in Dec 20 chain)【1】.

Some Context

• Little St. James: Private island owned by Jeffrey Epstein in the U.S. Virgin Islands, frequently used for private gatherings.
• Cantor Fitzgerald: Global financial services firm; Howard Lutnick is its chairman, and the firm’s email system was used for the correspondence.
• St. Thomas: One of the U.S. Virgin Islands, a common travel hub for visitors to Little St. James.
• Confidentiality notice: Legal disclaimer stating the email’s content is proprietary and must not be shared, typical for corporate communications.
• Chrisman’s Cove: Geographic reference on Little St. James island used to locate the proposed lunch site.

Deepak Chopra’s Email Thread Discussing a Dinner with Jeffrey Epstein and Others (Nov 29 2017)

Key Facts

• Chopra confirms a 7 p.m. dinner invitation with Epstein and guests – An email sent at 1:21 p.m. notes that Chopra is “confirmed for 7 pm tonight” and lists Jeffrey Epstein, Woody Allen and his wife Soon Yi, and Slovakian minister Miroslav Lajeak as attendees [1].
• Chopra apologizes for a delayed schedule and missed attendance – At 3:10 p.m., Chopra writes “delayed in Washington DC, unable to join tonight, sorry,” indicating a change in his availability [1].
• Multiple upcoming engagements are outlined – Chopra mentions a “meeting in Congress tomorrow in NJ,” events on Friday, a trip to Boston, and an extended stay in New York after December [1].
• Chopra’s professional affiliation and contact details are repeated – Several messages include his title “Deepak Chopra MD,” address “203 Costa Del Mur Road, Carlsbad CA 92009,” and affiliation with the “Chepra Foundation” and “Chopra Center for Wellbeing” [1].
• Assistant to Epstein confirms the dinner and asks about appetite – An email labeled “Assistant to Jeffrey Epstein” asks “OK for you to come hungry?” confirming the invitation and logistical detail [1].
• The correspondence shows a casual tone despite high‑profile participants – The exchange contains informal language (“fantastic!”, “oh nooooooll what ashame”) while arranging a meeting that includes notable figures from entertainment and politics [1].

Who Said What

• Deepak Chopra (author, MD, founder of the Chopra Center for Wellbeing) – “Sorry and disappointed… Was looking forward to it,” expressing regret over missing the dinner.
• Assistant to Jeffrey Epstein – “OK for you to come hungry?” confirming the dinner invitation and checking Chopra’s readiness.

Some Context

• Chepra Foundation – The charitable arm associated with Deepak Chopra, supporting health and wellness initiatives; mentioned in his email signature.
• Chopra Center for Wellbeing – A wellness institute founded by Deepak Chopra, offering programs on meditation and holistic health; listed as his affiliation.
• Miroslav Lajeak – Identified as an MFA (Minister of Foreign Affairs) from Slovakia, indicating a diplomatic guest at the dinner.
• Jeffrey Epstein – Financier and convicted sex offender whose social connections were the subject of extensive media scrutiny; the dinner organizer’s assistant is the source of the invitation.
• Woody Allen – Prominent filmmaker; his presence with wife Soon Yi highlights the high‑profile nature of the planned gathering.

Jeffrey Epstein Email Accuses Bill of Job Termination and Cover‑up

Key Facts

• Disbelief over job discharge and cover‑up request — Epstein writes that Bill chose to fire him and asked him to act as the “major actor” in covering up “morally inappropriate behavior,” threatening his hard‑won reputation【1】.
• Larry’s demand for renewed confidentiality and business cut‑off — He says Larry instructed him to recommit to a confidentiality agreement and to end any direct business relationship with Bill, citing public perception concerns【1】.
• Promised recommendation and severance turned hostile — Epstein claims Bill agreed to provide a recommendation letter and severance similar to Christine Tumer’s, but instead sent a “strongly worded email” denying future financial assistance【1】.
• Health issues and sensitive requests disclosed — He mentions a recent eye operation, reading emails with one eye, and references Bill’s “STD” and a request for antibiotics to be given surreptitiously to Melinda【1】.
• Confidentiality notice cites attorney‑client privilege and insider status — The email ends with a disclaimer that the content is confidential, may be attorney‑client privileged, and could constitute insider information, referencing codes EFTA00965773 and EFTA00965774【1】.
• Offer of compensation, severance, and partnership share — Epstein proposes a $30‑million share (30‑40 % of a $100 million partnership) plus five years of severance, contingent on agreed terms, and urges Bill to delete the incriminating emails【1】.

Who Said What

• Jeffrey Epstein: “you have decided to discharge me from my job” – describing Bill’s action.
• Jeffrey Epstein: “you told me that Melinda insists on ignoring our friendship” – citing Bill’s alleged instruction.
• Jeffrey Epstein: “I have more money than anyone needs and will do my utmost to structure something so that you will not be penalized” – offering financial remediation.

Some Context

• Confidentiality agreement: A legal contract obligating parties to keep certain information private, often used to protect trade secrets or sensitive negotiations.
• Attorney‑client privileged: A legal principle that communications between a lawyer and their client are protected from disclosure, ensuring candid discussion.
• Insider information: Non‑public material information about a company or partnership that could affect its value if disclosed.
• Severance: Compensation paid to an employee upon termination, intended to cushion the transition.
• Partnership share: Ownership percentage in a joint venture; Epstein references a 30‑40 % stake in a $100 million partnership.