Maduro Pleads Not Guilty in Manhattan Court After Midnight Caracas Capture
Updated (2 articles)
Midnight Raid Captures Maduro and Flores in Caracas Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores were seized from their home in a midnight operation conducted by U.S. forces on 4 January 2026, then transported under heavy security to the United States, both wearing leg shackles and jail attire[1][2]. The operation, described as dramatic and bold, involved a rapid extraction that bypassed Venezuelan security forces and placed the couple in federal custody abroad[1][2]. Their capture triggered immediate diplomatic fallout, prompting Venezuela to label the act an unlawful abduction[1][2].
Maduro Appears in Manhattan Federal Court and Pleads Not Guilty On 5 January 2026, Maduro entered Manhattan’s federal courthouse, speaking through an interpreter, and formally entered a not‑guilty plea to the drug‑trafficking charges[1][2]. He asserted that he remains the constitutional president of Venezuela and demanded immunity as a head of state, challenging the legality of his detention[1][2]. The judge addressed procedural matters while the defense prepared to invoke sovereign‑immunity arguments, echoing precedents such as Manuel Noriega’s failed defense[1][2].
Indictment Accuses Maduro of Cartel Collaboration and Cocaine Trafficking A 25‑page federal indictment alleges that Maduro and senior officials collaborated with drug cartels to funnel thousands of tons of cocaine into the United States, exposing them to potential life‑sentence penalties[1][2]. The document also details alleged kidnappings, killings, and other criminal acts linked to the trafficking network[1][2]. Prosecutors argue the scheme generated billions in illicit revenue, intensifying the case’s geopolitical and law‑enforcement significance[1][2].
International Reactions Include UN Emergency Session and Interim Leadership The United Nations Security Council convened an emergency meeting to discuss the capture’s international‑law implications and humanitarian concerns in Venezuela[1][2]. Meanwhile, Delcy Rodríguez was sworn in as interim president by her brother, signaling a rapid leadership transition in Caracas[1][2]. Both articles note that the immunity defense will be a central legal battle, with the Noriega precedent highlighted as a cautionary example[1][2].
Sources
-
1.
King5: Maduro pleads not guilty in Manhattan court – Details the midnight Caracas raid, Maduro’s courtroom plea, the 25‑page indictment linking him to cartels, the head‑of‑state immunity argument, and the UN Security Council emergency meeting with Delcy Rodríguez’s swearing‑in.
-
2.
WBNS: Maduro appears in U.S. court, pleads not guilty to drug‑trafficking charges after Caracas raid – Emphasizes the courtroom appearance, not‑guilty plea, legal challenges to the abduction, the indictment’s cocaine‑trafficking accusations, and the broader global and regional reactions including UN and Venezuelan leadership shifts.
Timeline
Jan 4, 2026 (overnight) – Venezuelan security forces raid Maduro’s Caracas home, seize President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores, place them in leg shackles and transport them under heavy security to the United States [1][2]
Jan 5, 2026 (early morning) – The United Nations Security Council holds an emergency meeting on the abduction’s legality and humanitarian impact, while interim president Delcy Rodríguez is sworn in by her brother, signaling a swift leadership shift [1][2]
Jan 5, 2026 (midday) – A 25‑page federal indictment is unsealed, accusing Maduro and co‑defendants of collaborating with drug cartels to ship thousands of tons of cocaine into the U.S. and of orchestrating kidnappings and killings, exposing him to possible life‑sentence penalties [1][2]
Jan 5, 2026 (afternoon) – In Manhattan federal court, Maduro appears before Judge John Pollack, declares “I am the constitutional president of Venezuela,” and pleads not guilty to all charges, with his interpreter translating his statements [1][2]
Jan 5, 2026 (afternoon, same hearing) – Maduro’s lawyer argues that, as a head of state, he is entitled to sovereign immunity and will contest the legality of his capture, citing the failed immunity defense of former Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega as precedent [1][2]