Ministry declares bills comply with 1953 armistice On Jan. 29 2026 the Unification Ministry issued a press notice stating that the draft legislation granting the government control over non‑military DMZ access “does not conflict with the armistice at all” because it mandates advance consultation with the United Nations Command (UNC) [1][2][3]. The ministry emphasized cooperation with the National Assembly’s legislative process while respecting the armistice framework. It pledged to continue coordinating with the UNC on any civilian entry decisions.

Bills aim to regulate civilian movement for peaceful purposes Ruling‑party lawmakers have drafted measures that would give South Korea authority to manage civilian and other non‑military visits to the buffer zone, framing the initiative as a way to promote tourism and other peaceful activities in the DMZ [1][2][3]. The proposals seek to balance security concerns with public interest in accessing the historically significant area. Parliamentary discussion of the bills must include the required UNC consultation step.

UNC labels proposals “completely at odds” with armistice The U.S.–led UNC, which administers the DMZ under the 1953 agreement, issued a strong objection a day before the ministry’s statement, describing the bills as “completely at odds” with the armistice [1][2][3]. The command warned that unilateral South Korean regulation could undermine the supervisory framework established after the Korean War. UNC’s stance underscores its claim to authority over any changes to DMZ access.

Unification Minister Chung Dong‑young reassures no diplomatic fallout Minister Chung Dong‑young reiterated that the legislation “does not conflict with the armistice” and asserted that any disagreement with the UNC will not damage South Korea‑U.S. relations [1][2][3]. He made these remarks during a morning briefing on Jan. 29 2026, echoing the ministry’s confidence in the bills’ compliance. Chung’s comments aim to allay concerns about potential strain with the United States.

Defense and foreign ministries stress coordination and legislative rights Defense spokesperson Chung Binna said the ministry respects the UNC’s mandate and will work closely with it on DMZ use, adopting a cautious tone [1][2][3]. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Park Il highlighted the government’s respect for the National Assembly’s authority and the need to consider public aspirations for a peaceful DMZ [1][2][3]. Both ministries stress a balance between security, civilian interests, and international obligations.