Top Headlines

Feeds

Trump Replaces Lead Architect and Expands White House Ballroom Amid Planning Controversy

Updated (2 articles)

Architectural Leadership Shift Confirmed Across White House The White House hired Shalom Baranes Associates to lead the ballroom project, replacing longtime architect James McCrery [1][2]. Both outlets note that McCrery’s future involvement is disputed, with some officials saying he was fired while others say he will stay on as a consultant [1][2]. The change follows reported clashes over the project’s size and scope [1][2].

Ballroom Size and Cost Expanded Dramatically Initial plans described a 90,000 sq ft ballroom seating 650 guests at a $200 million budget [2]. Current specifications call for a 1,350‑guest capacity, a footprint still near 90,000 sq ft but with a $300 million price tag, reflecting a substantially larger structure [1][2]. BBC adds that the original design targeted 500 guests, underscoring the scale of the expansion [1].

East Wing Demolition Occurred Without Planning Approval The East Wing was demolished in October to clear space for the new ballroom [1][2]. CNN reports the demolition proceeded without National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) clearance, prompting the commission to schedule a review of the ballroom plans this month [2]. BBC confirms the NCPC must assess the construction plan before work can resume [1].

Legislative and Administrative Responses Highlight Governance Concerns Senator Richard Blumenthal introduced the No Palaces Act, mandating NCPC approval before any historic federal building is altered or demolished [1]. White House spokesman Davis Ingle praised Baranes’ experience and called the ballroom “the greatest addition since the Oval Office” [1]. NCPC head Will Scharf announced the commission will begin its review once the revised plans are submitted [2].

Sources (2 articles)