US Push Frames Greenland as Strategic NATO Asset Washington argues Greenland is vital for national security and NATO defense, citing Arctic resources and geopolitical positioning, while also threatening a 25 % tariff if a deal is not reached [1][2]. The White House has not ruled out military options, raising concerns about violations of international law and NATO cohesion [2]. U.S. officials maintain negotiations remain open, but the rhetoric emphasizes a hard‑line stance on acquiring the territory [1].

Greenland Leaders Emphasize Sovereignty and Public Opposition Prime Minister Jens‑Frederik Nielsen reiterated that Greenland is “not for sale,” demanding any cooperation respect the island’s constitutional status and international law [1][2]. Polls show a clear majority of the 57,000 residents oppose U.S. annexation, though some favor eventual independence or closer ties with Denmark [1][2]. Nielsen called for dialogue and peaceful cooperation, rejecting any forceful acquisition [2].

Danish Defense Committee Warns Invasion Would Trigger War Opposition MP Rasmus Jarlov told CNN that an American invasion would spark direct conflict between former allies, with Denmark prepared to defend Greenland militarily [1]. He framed the scenario as a war‑triggering move, underscoring the seriousness of U.S. ambitions in the Arctic [1].

EU Mulls Trade Countermeasures Amid U.S. Tariff Threats European leaders, including Ursula von der Leyen, discussed deploying a “bazooka” trade tool and other tariffs to counter potential U.S. duties [1]. Trump’s existing 10 % tariffs on several European nations and the threatened 25 % duty on a Greenland deal have prompted calls for a unified EU response [1].