Scalia’s Textualism Shapes 2025‑2026 Supreme Court Decisions on Tariffs and Elections
Updated (5 articles)
Scalia’s Death and Originalism’s Mainstream Rise The Court lost Justice Antonin Scalia on February 13, 2016, when he died at a Texas hunting lodge at age 79 [1]. His passing triggered a political scramble during the 2016 presidential election and accelerated the adoption of originalist methodology [1]. Originally a fringe theory, originalism gained “the status of respectability” by 2008 and now underpins most constitutional arguments [1].
Conservative Justices Regularly Invoke Scalia’s Opinions Justice Amy Coney Barrett relied on Scalia’s 1999 reasoning in Trump v. Casa during a 2025 case [1]. Chief Justice John Roberts quoted Scalia in a January 2025 opinion concerning mail‑in ballot rules [1]. Justice Samuel Alito challenged a lawyer’s statutory reading by citing Scalia’s textualist approach, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh echoed Scalia’s 1992 metaphor in the 2022 Dobbs decision [1].
2025 Tariff‑Power Dispute Highlights Textualist Arguments In early November 2025, the Court heard a tariff‑power dispute where both parties anchored arguments in originalist sources [1]. Former clerk Paul Clement emphasized “plain meaning” and dictionary definitions in briefing materials [1]. Former clerk D. John Sauer later referenced Scalia’s “wolf comes as a wolf” metaphor during December 2025 oral arguments [1].
Scholars Note Growing Yet Rigid Influence Vanderbilt professor Brian Fitzpatrick, a former Scalia clerk, observes that Scalia’s ideas are more influential than ever, though newer textualists apply them more strictly [1]. This assessment underscores a trend toward tighter adherence to Scalia’s methodology across recent rulings [1].
Videos (1)
Timeline
1804 – The impeachment of Justice Samuel Chase fails, establishing a historic precedent that judges cannot be removed for their decisions and cementing the principle of judicial independence [2][3].
1986 – Antonin Scalia joins the Supreme Court and begins promoting originalism, then a marginal theory, which later becomes a dominant interpretive approach [1].
1992 – Scalia issues a textualist opinion that Justice Brett Kavanaugh later echoes in the 2022 Dobbs decision, illustrating Scalia’s lasting doctrinal influence [1].
1999 – A Scalia decision in Trump v. Casa is later cited by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, showing the justice’s rulings become touchstones for contemporary conservative jurisprudence [1].
2008 – The Federalist Society notes that originalism has gained “the status of respectability,” reflecting Scalia’s successful mainstreaming of the theory [1].
Feb 13, 2016 – Justice Antonin Scalia dies at a Texas hunting lodge, reshaping the Court’s composition and reverberating through the 2016 presidential race [1].
June 24, 2022 – The Supreme Court issues the Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade, with Justice Kavanaugh echoing Scalia’s 1992 textualist reasoning [1].
2024 – Federal courts record a nine‑percent drop in term filings to 3,856, hear 73 cases, and issue 56 opinions, indicating shifting caseload patterns ahead of a politically charged 2025 term [4].
Jan 2025 – Chief Justice John Roberts quotes Scalia’s textualism in a mail‑in ballot opinion, reinforcing the originalist framework in contemporary election law [1].
Mar 2025 – Roberts issues a rare public rebuke after President Trump calls for the impeachment of a judge in a deportation case, highlighting heightened tensions over judicial accountability [5].
2025 – The Court’s “shadow docket” delivers roughly two dozen wins for the Trump administration—including a transgender military ban and spending clawbacks—while also blocking the National Guard deployment to Chicago, underscoring mixed outcomes on executive power [5].
2025 – The Court aligns with Trump on several substantive actions: canceling foreign aid, halting public‑health funding, firing independent‑agency leaders, stopping immigration‑status interrogations, and mandating passport sex markers match biological sex [2].
Nov 2025 – In a tariff‑power dispute, lawyers invoke Scalia’s “plain meaning” approach and dictionary definitions, demonstrating originalism’s continued courtroom sway [1].
Dec 2025 – Former clerk D. John Sauer cites Scalia’s “wolf comes as a wolf” metaphor in Supreme Court arguments, highlighting the justice’s enduring rhetorical power [1].
Dec 31, 2025 – Chief Justice Roberts releases a 13‑page year‑end letter declaring the Constitution “firm and unshaken,” quoting Calvin Coolidge and Thomas Paine, and urging judges to heed their oath amid a turbulent political climate [4][5][2].
Jan 3, 2026 – Former prosecutor Joyce Vance publishes a Substack critique asserting that most justices “failed to show up,” decrying the empty‑room image in Roberts’s report and warning that the Court’s silence undermines democratic safeguards [3].
July 4, 2026 – The United States approaches its 250th anniversary, a milestone Roberts cites to remind the nation of the enduring relevance of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution [2].
2026 – The Supreme Court’s docket anticipates landmark cases on ending birthright citizenship by executive order, imposing sweeping tariffs, dismissing a Federal Reserve governor amid mortgage‑fraud allegations, and broader disputes over presidential authority and immigration, positioning the Court at the center of pivotal constitutional battles [2][3][4].
All related articles (5 articles)
-
CNN: Scalia’s Legacy Fuels Modern Supreme Court Rulings
-
Newsweek: Most Supreme Court Justices Fail to Show Up, Joyce Vance Argues
-
Newsweek: Roberts frames 2025 judiciary year-end report around 'firm and unshaken' Constitution
-
AP: Chief Justice says Constitution remains firm as Supreme Court faces pivotal decisions
-
CNN: Roberts urges judicial independence in history-focused year-end report
External resources (14 links)
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAxs44lDc4g (cited 1 times)
- https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep505/usrep505833/usrep505833.pdf (cited 1 times)
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a884_8n59.pdf (cited 1 times)
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-568new_4gcj.pdf (cited 1 times)
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-621_q86b.pdf (cited 1 times)
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-813_5426.pdf (cited 1 times)
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-924_2c8f.pdf (cited 1 times)
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-332_7lhn.pdf (cited 1 times)
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/year-end/2025year-endreport.pdf (cited 1 times)
- https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/republican-candidates-debate-greenville-south-carolina (cited 1 times)
- https://www.reuters.com/article/world/uk/supreme-court-justices-heap-warmth-wit-on-scalia-idUSKCN0W35TJ/ (cited 1 times)
- https://joycevance.substack.com/p/the-chief-justices-report-on-the?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true (cited 1 times)