Cross‑party scrutiny targets Lee Hye‑hoon’s background and conduct Lee Hye‑hoon, a three‑term former conservative lawmaker, was nominated by President Lee Jae Myung to head the new Ministry of Planning and Budget, but both ruling and opposition camps cite her husband’s real‑estate dealings and reports of abusive remarks toward subordinates and an intern as reasons for concern [1][2][3]. The nominee’s alleged inflation of an apartment application score by listing her married son as a cohabiting family member adds a fraud dimension to the controversy [2]. These issues have fueled calls for her resignation and intensified media focus on her personal and professional record [1][3].

PPP boycott stalls hearing until requested documents are submitted The People Power Party (PPP) began a boycott on Jan 19, refusing to attend the confirmation hearing because Lee had not provided key documents demanded by lawmakers [2][3]. Committee chair Lim Lee‑ja suspended the Strategy and Finance Committee meeting, urging further negotiations [3]. After intense talks, rival parties reached a compromise to hold the hearing on Friday only if Lee submits the missing paperwork, signaling a temporary pause in the standoff [1].

President Lee pushes forward despite mounting controversy President Lee Jae Myung told ruling leaders that the nominee was “brought in with difficulty” and deserved a hearing, underscoring the administration’s determination to proceed [2]. He indicated that, after the reporting deadline, he could either appoint Lee directly or request a resubmission, opening a ten‑day window for a possible hearing [2]. The original rationale of political integration is now questioned as allegations erode public confidence [2][1].

Polls show overwhelming public doubt about Lee’s suitability Recent surveys reveal that up to 68 % of respondents consider Lee unfit for the budget minister role, reflecting the impact of the apartment‑application scandal and broader misconduct accusations [2]. Lee’s refusal to submit certain documents, citing privacy concerns, has further damaged her credibility [2]. Opposition lawmakers and minor parties continue to demand full disclosure before any confirmation proceeds [3].